nachocheesefries
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2006
- Professional Status
- Certified Residential Appraiser
- State
- Missouri
Talked to an executive at a large AMC conglomerate on Friday. We had a 20-30 minute conversation that came across as honest and forthright. This is what they said in short form (my words not theirs).
-FNMA is aware of the irony between being hyper focused (like a psycho) on detail on one hand (MLS photos, measuring standards, etc.) when the Appraiser is doing a 1004 but, then on the other hand, if they can avoid a 1004, they don't even want the appraiser to look at the property and don't really care about any standard. The AMC is pushing for change on that front...LOL Oker..we will see.
They are pushing FNMA/FHA to get rid of the over the top requirements (interior shed photos, original comp photos, etc.) This, not to benefit the Appraiser, rather, even out their workflow because they have a number of clients that order appraisals directly with minimal requirements but also order through the AMC with the additional layer cake of requirements that increase costs to the AMC, therefore, the client and borrower.
-Some AMC's are going to hire teams of retiredish STAFF appraisers to make up 3-4 man teams (one Appraiser will do the inspections, another will do the form, another will do the analysis). This is one prong of production, the other involves typical desktops and AVMS, and the third is fee appraisers completing 1004's. This model has proven successful in another country they operate in. It was stated that the other country they operate in also implemented the Desktop deals trying to speed things up/cut costs and it failed nationwide. They approach things through a technology lense...which is likely smart. Apparently, the three prong model has proven successful. They indicated massive losses to Govt/lenders by Desktops initially in certain markets that their system eventually curbed (just what they said). Indication was that the losses take years to realize, so initial modest success is not a good barometer.
-It was stated that currently, the Desktop game only works in larger cities but not in rural or suburban markets because they can't get enough retirees to get on board (to sink the profession--my words here). Desktops are only available in limited urban markets and it will likely stay that way for the foreseeable future. I was surprised to hear that kind of honesty. It was stated that they are not recruiting current panel appraisers in a big way, because they have a team going after NON panel appraisers so as NOT to interfere with their existing fee panel/business.
-It was acknowledged that Desktops are not a time saver and not much of a money saver. Again, they are only being pushed in urban areas with lots of volume and appraisers willing to complete them. Stated they currently charge the same for a desktop as a full. Its about time savings, not cost I suppose?
***All this to say, the conversation was confirmation of what I feel in my gut and what others on this Forum have been saying. In large urban areas, the Desktops are likely to impact business at some point in the near future (2-3 years). They have not figured out how a computer can replace rural and suburban appraisers and I am not sure that is even on their radar and I am 100% certain, its not possible to do without sacrificing reliability. The entire scheme basically hinges on the AMC's ability to find semi-retired appraisers to churn and burn desktops (and cut the throats of everyone else). The AMC did not seem to be concerned with competency across multiple markets..so, I think if they allow Appraisers from other markets to complete Desktops, it will put a squeeze on urban Appraisers. If I were in one of those areas and saw another Appraiser from three hours away doing desktops, I would turn them into the commish in a hot second!
-FNMA is aware of the irony between being hyper focused (like a psycho) on detail on one hand (MLS photos, measuring standards, etc.) when the Appraiser is doing a 1004 but, then on the other hand, if they can avoid a 1004, they don't even want the appraiser to look at the property and don't really care about any standard. The AMC is pushing for change on that front...LOL Oker..we will see.
They are pushing FNMA/FHA to get rid of the over the top requirements (interior shed photos, original comp photos, etc.) This, not to benefit the Appraiser, rather, even out their workflow because they have a number of clients that order appraisals directly with minimal requirements but also order through the AMC with the additional layer cake of requirements that increase costs to the AMC, therefore, the client and borrower.
-Some AMC's are going to hire teams of retiredish STAFF appraisers to make up 3-4 man teams (one Appraiser will do the inspections, another will do the form, another will do the analysis). This is one prong of production, the other involves typical desktops and AVMS, and the third is fee appraisers completing 1004's. This model has proven successful in another country they operate in. It was stated that the other country they operate in also implemented the Desktop deals trying to speed things up/cut costs and it failed nationwide. They approach things through a technology lense...which is likely smart. Apparently, the three prong model has proven successful. They indicated massive losses to Govt/lenders by Desktops initially in certain markets that their system eventually curbed (just what they said). Indication was that the losses take years to realize, so initial modest success is not a good barometer.
-It was stated that currently, the Desktop game only works in larger cities but not in rural or suburban markets because they can't get enough retirees to get on board (to sink the profession--my words here). Desktops are only available in limited urban markets and it will likely stay that way for the foreseeable future. I was surprised to hear that kind of honesty. It was stated that they are not recruiting current panel appraisers in a big way, because they have a team going after NON panel appraisers so as NOT to interfere with their existing fee panel/business.
-It was acknowledged that Desktops are not a time saver and not much of a money saver. Again, they are only being pushed in urban areas with lots of volume and appraisers willing to complete them. Stated they currently charge the same for a desktop as a full. Its about time savings, not cost I suppose?
***All this to say, the conversation was confirmation of what I feel in my gut and what others on this Forum have been saying. In large urban areas, the Desktops are likely to impact business at some point in the near future (2-3 years). They have not figured out how a computer can replace rural and suburban appraisers and I am not sure that is even on their radar and I am 100% certain, its not possible to do without sacrificing reliability. The entire scheme basically hinges on the AMC's ability to find semi-retired appraisers to churn and burn desktops (and cut the throats of everyone else). The AMC did not seem to be concerned with competency across multiple markets..so, I think if they allow Appraisers from other markets to complete Desktops, it will put a squeeze on urban Appraisers. If I were in one of those areas and saw another Appraiser from three hours away doing desktops, I would turn them into the commish in a hot second!
Last edited: