- Joined
- May 2, 2002
- Professional Status
- Certified General Appraiser
- State
- Arkansas
It seems the consensus in the WRE mag this quarter is over the fees and the comments made to the CFPB over appraisal fees. The consensus is obvious. AMC fees and actual fees charged by the appraiser need to be separate line items. And everyone from Joan Trice, the NAR, the Mortgage bankers (State and National) and AI-ASA-ASFMRA made a statement about how the fees need to be separated....except one - REVAA, like anyone would be surprised.
Their asinine argument is that it was NOT necessary since the "AMC is responsible for selecting appraiser based upon "quality of past work, skill set, education, experience, and geographic competency". So, that's why they send you those offers to bid that are 120 miles away for $295 less technology fees.
And who is REVAA's great partner now? Oh, TAF WTF
Their asinine argument is that it was NOT necessary since the "AMC is responsible for selecting appraiser based upon "quality of past work, skill set, education, experience, and geographic competency". So, that's why they send you those offers to bid that are 120 miles away for $295 less technology fees.
And who is REVAA's great partner now? Oh, TAF WTF
Surprise! By a UNAMINOUS vote of TAF's board today, REVAA is now a "partner" of TAF.
It would have been nice to open this up for a comment period, but who cares what the peasants think?
Does anyone still believe independent appraisers have a seat at any table in this industry?
It would have been nice to open this up for a comment period, but who cares what the peasants think?
Does anyone still believe independent appraisers have a seat at any table in this industry?
- Non Sequitur
- Replies: 175
- Forum: Improving the Profession