shrubberyvaluation
Elite Member
- Joined
- May 2, 2012
- Professional Status
- Appraiser Trainee
- State
- Maryland
You shouldn't be if you make the scope of work clear. In reality a lawyer can blanket you in a lawsuit.
No,not UMW.You can try. No good deed goes unpunished.
You are not incorrect in your observations, it is just not their objective.
UWM?
In a sane world that’s true. I’m trying to navigate this world.I personally do not see why someone completing a 1004 D for a specific item repaired or installed has any liability beyond that one item -
I was taught to reinspect the whole house and submit all new photos.A 1004d is not an appraisal. A monkey can do it. It is a specific item repair requested. You over stepped. Did they ask you for a home inspection, or to review the inspection. I would never do a 1004d for another appraiser done. You do need to state that you were not involved in the previous appraisal. Now you have learned why, it's an existental threat.
If i'm the lender, i'm saying wha da to your over stepped 1004d, and checking you off my list. Worth doing soneone's appraisal 1004d.
If that is your scope of work.I was taught to reinspect the whole house and submit all new photos.
I personally do not see why someone completing a 1004 D for a specific item repaired or installed has any liability beyond that one item -
I have revised my opinion from my last previous comment. If you only state that the following specific repairs were completed, you are safe. End of being the deficiency police. Well, unless it is something obviously bad.When an FHA report is submitted subject to repair(s), it is assumed that when those specific repairs are satisfactorily completed that the property will meet the minimum FHA standards.