Terrel L. Shields
Elite Member
- Joined
- May 2, 2002
- Professional Status
- Certified General Appraiser
- State
- Arkansas
The biggest headwinds I see to a healthy recovery in this country is:
High fuel prices will plague the transportation industry and consumers. Electrical supply will remain strong and hopefully more renewables and nat gas plants will go on line. The price of nat gas needs to improve and oil prices need to drop somewhat. Nat gas is too cheap and it is getting many companies talking about compressing it and shipping it OVERSEAS. That's plain nuts but nothing prevents the U. S. from EXPORTING gas...whereas oil cannot be exported except is special cases.
Without some push from government nat gas cars will not be a significant dent in the driving public. Forget this stupid mass transit idea. It works in areas of concentrated population but the rest of the nation runs in autos and trucks.
China will continue to tie their currency to ours so long as it makes exporting cheap and thus benefits them at our expense.
The glut of housing has to diminish and it would help if the examiners get off the back of the small banks. They are being hammered while the big banks are getting unjustified support.
Regulations have to be revised to maximize incentives to hire, etc. One simple regulation revolves around the flood zone issue. The banks are now having to require ALL borrowers to have flood insurance even in areas where the flood maps are inconclusive or worthless. Two examples.
There is a car wash in a small town that is in a flood zone - concrete block and the equipment is basically unfloodable. There is nothing to hurt and the flood isn't going to be over a foot deep. Further, it is flooded only because of a coffer dam the city erected. When it flooded an adjacent store, the insurance was turned down because they claimed the flood was the result of the city and the city claimed they cannot be sued....catch 22.
The other situation was one where a building was not in the flood zone but a remapping resulted in a survey showing that ONE CORNER SIX INCHES UP on the foundation was in the flood zone. They had to buy flood insurance. It is a small branch creek, a backwater and there won't be enough current to even undermine that corner...go figure. The owner his out $2000 a year for insurance now.
That is bureacratic dumbness at its worst.
High fuel prices will plague the transportation industry and consumers. Electrical supply will remain strong and hopefully more renewables and nat gas plants will go on line. The price of nat gas needs to improve and oil prices need to drop somewhat. Nat gas is too cheap and it is getting many companies talking about compressing it and shipping it OVERSEAS. That's plain nuts but nothing prevents the U. S. from EXPORTING gas...whereas oil cannot be exported except is special cases.
Without some push from government nat gas cars will not be a significant dent in the driving public. Forget this stupid mass transit idea. It works in areas of concentrated population but the rest of the nation runs in autos and trucks.
China will continue to tie their currency to ours so long as it makes exporting cheap and thus benefits them at our expense.
The glut of housing has to diminish and it would help if the examiners get off the back of the small banks. They are being hammered while the big banks are getting unjustified support.
Regulations have to be revised to maximize incentives to hire, etc. One simple regulation revolves around the flood zone issue. The banks are now having to require ALL borrowers to have flood insurance even in areas where the flood maps are inconclusive or worthless. Two examples.
There is a car wash in a small town that is in a flood zone - concrete block and the equipment is basically unfloodable. There is nothing to hurt and the flood isn't going to be over a foot deep. Further, it is flooded only because of a coffer dam the city erected. When it flooded an adjacent store, the insurance was turned down because they claimed the flood was the result of the city and the city claimed they cannot be sued....catch 22.
The other situation was one where a building was not in the flood zone but a remapping resulted in a survey showing that ONE CORNER SIX INCHES UP on the foundation was in the flood zone. They had to buy flood insurance. It is a small branch creek, a backwater and there won't be enough current to even undermine that corner...go figure. The owner his out $2000 a year for insurance now.
That is bureacratic dumbness at its worst.