Sean, thanks for responding.
I understand the changes, however, I was wondering if the "Hobby Farms" on 10,20,30,40 acres, etc. would happen to fall under this and not be able to be appraised by a Cert. Res? I saw an article on the MREAC website newsletter that stated, "Any land with Income Potential" could not be appraised by a Cert. Res. This would basicially exclude ALL acreage sites since nearly all could have hay, raise 2 calves, etc. Also, was personally told by a Commissioner that a "Hobby Farm" could be appraised, as long as it didn't produce any income. Basically, Cert. Res. appraisers can appraise acreage and homes with acreage as long as they don't produce any income. I personally don't see how that is possible. From your comments, I don't take it that way, but just aren't sure based on what I'm reading and being told.
Also, note this from the rule, "This designation permits the appraisal of vacant or unimproved land that may be utilized for one- to four- (1–4) family purposes." Have you noticed, or has anyone pointed out before, that it doesn't state that HBU is needed, but only that the land "may be utilized" for ..... ? They use HBU in the ARE definition, why not use it here? Seems to me to be a lesser standard and I don't know why it isn't included.
And....following your reasoning, would a lakefront "lot" of acreage size, be considered "recreational" and outside the scope of a Cert. Res? I'm not sure what qualifies as a "recreational" site? Would this be vacant land with significant slopes, covered in mature trees and brush? Basically, prime "hunting" land? Not trying to argue, but like you said, trying to stay out of trouble.
Thanks for your thoughts.