• Welcome to AppraisersForum.com, the premier online  community for the discussion of real estate appraisal. Register a free account to be able to post and unlock additional forums and features.

Number Hitters still cruzing along.

Status
Not open for further replies.

panappr

Elite Member
Joined
Dec 5, 2007
Professional Status
Certified Residential Appraiser
State
California
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]CFPB Fines Lender, AMC for Inflated Appraisal Fees
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif] The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau announced Aug. 12 that it fined mortgage lender Amerisave Mortgage Corp., its affiliate, Novo Appraisal Management Company, and the organizations’ collective owner, Patrick Markert, $19.3 million for allegedly luring prospective borrowers with misleading interest rates and trapping them with inflated appraisal fees.


The CFPB claimed that the lender and its affiliated AMC violated the Truth in Lending Act and Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act by enticing tens of thousands of borrowers with deceptive advertising and then illegally overcharging them for third-party services.


The CFPB alleged that starting in 2011, Amerisave began advertising inaccurate interest rates online, and once borrowers were on Amerisave’s website, it gave quotes to consumers based on an 800 FICO score, even when consumers disclosed a lower credit score.


After borrowers were attracted by the promise of low interest rates, Amerisave required borrowers to order and give payment authorization information for an appraisal before it would offer a “Good Faith Estimate” for the mortgage. Amerisave then referred the appraisal orders to Novo under the guise of a “special deal” for consumers without shopping around to other third-party providers and without disclosing to the prospective borrowers its affiliated relationship with Novo. Amerisave leveraged this relationship with Novo to charge consumers for “appraisal validation” reports, which Novo marked up by as much as 900 percent.


The CFPB alleged that Markert received more than $3 million in indirect profits from the alleged “appraisal validation” scheme.


“Amerisave lured consumers in with deceptive advertising, trapped them with costly upfront fees and then illegally overcharged them for services from an undisclosed affiliate,” Richard Cordray, CFPB director, said in a statement. “By the time consumers could have discovered the advertised low rates were too good to be true, they had already committed to pay hundreds of dollars to Amerisave. Today’s action puts an end to Amerisave’s unacceptable bait-and-switch scheme and holds Patrick Markert personally responsible for his illegal actions.”


The CFPB has ordered Amerisave and Novo to pay $14.8 million to refund consumers, in addition to a $4.5 million penalty. Markert has been ordered to personally pay a $1.5 million penalty for his part in the scheme.


Read the full CFBP statement.

[/FONT]
[/FONT]
 
The title is wrong...this is not about number hitters, about sleazy lender. Why are they still allowed to operate?
 
Markert has been ordered to personally pay a $1.5 million penalty for his part in the scheme.
Would prefer he rot in jail until he is 85.
 
They were a semi-acceptable client of mine prior to their AMC venture.

I never did a deal through their AMC as I recall. I might have been on the bad appraiser list though, for being late once-came down sick as a dog, let them know, worked wounded, still punished.:laugh:
 
I am confused. The article has nothing to do with "number hitters".


The article is about a fine against an individual, who owns a lender and an AMC.
 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I am confused. The article has nothing to do with "number hitters".

required borrowers to order and give payment authorization information for an appraisal before it would offer a “Good Faith Estimate” for the mortgage. Amerisave then referred the appraisal orders to Novo under the guise of a “special deal” for consumers without shopping around to other third-party providers and without disclosing to the prospective borrowers its affiliated relationship with Novo. Amerisave leveraged this relationship with Novo to charge consumers for “appraisal validation” reports, which Novo marked up by as much as 900 percent.
Sounds fishy to me...what is "validation"?
 
A sample of the CFPB seeking cash flow. No different from the local cop pulling over & citing the safe driver at 11 MPH over the speed limit on the freeway, who in no fashion was ever a hazard to the surrounding drivers.
 
I didn't even know there was an audit team yet. I thought one might be coming, but this looks like it could be the beginning of a trend. I'm sure the audit team wasn't developed for one audit. Idk.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Find a Real Estate Appraiser - Enter Zip Code

Copyright © 2000-, AppraisersForum.com, All Rights Reserved
AppraisersForum.com is proudly hosted by the folks at
AppraiserSites.com
Back
Top