Michael S
Senior Member
- Joined
- Mar 18, 2009
- Professional Status
- Certified General Appraiser
- State
- New Mexico
Congrats on finishing the courses and good luck on the test!
As you know, the difficulty in using an existing property for the demo is ensuring it has all the required elements that need to be demonstrated.
The advantage of the Capstone is that it has all the required elements that need to be demonstrated.
If you are fortunate enough to have an existing report that has all the elements necessary to meet the demonstration requirements, then I would agree with your strategy; it may just require some minor tweaking.
My Capstone assignment was data rich and obviously designed to be able to meet the demonstration requirements. The trade-off of the Capstone (IMO) is this: You pay a fee to get an assignment and the data that meets the demonstration requirements. You are put on a time-line and this assists keeping your focus on completing the assignment within the due date. If your first submission is inadequate you can complete a second submission. The disadvantage is this: If you fail to meet the deadline, you are out the fee.
While I believe there is still a timeline and hard deadlines for a self-directed demonstration report, all the responsibility for ensuring that the necessary demonstration elements are met are on the shoulders of the appraiser. Obviously), this is the way it was traditionally completed and it can be done this way. The advantage (IMO) is if one has a sufficiently diverse practice, one likely has done or knows of a property that can meet all the required demonstration elements. And, rather than paying to get a demonstration-eligible property/assignment, one has already been paid to do that assignment and one can hopefully just tweak it as needed.
In evaluating the choices, I think the biggest challenge will be to ensure that there is sufficient data available to do the Fundamental Market Analysis to the level/degree that is expected. My Capstone property was located in an urban area where there was plenty of information (included in the package). If I am in a more remote market, I might not have the data available that the graders of the demonstration reports might expect or require.
Good luck, Michael!
Data is always scarce here in New Mexico, especially with the non-disclosure element thrown in. There's a certain percentage of sales that you'll just never be able to use as comps since nobody can confirm the sales price or other details due to confidentiality/non-disclosure agreements or just plain not wanting to talk.
I've done an FMA on an apartment property (a superfluous request from a client but a decent learning experience as I had just taken the market analysis course a month or two earlier) but I think I might consider an industrial property and go the functional or external obsolescence route rather than an FMA. There's a decent sized industrial park here that I've done some work in and it's mostly owned by the original developer. If I offered to provide a free appraisal of one of his properties he would probably be willing to provide with information on the other properties including construction costs, expenses, rents, etc.
I'm not too worried about the cost of the capstone course but the time involved. The cost is a factor though since I'll be out another $1,000 or so for travel and lodging on top of the cost of the course. Since I'll be starting from scratch it would probably take longer than if I use a property here locally that I'm somewhat familiar with and have a lot of the data on already.