Expireds and withdrawns (shows what didn't initially sell)
2003 - 12,469
2004 - 14,269
2005a - 9719
2005b - 15,933 (As I say, some markets started to peak midyear)
2005 - 25,574
2006a -19009
2006b -26,675
2006 - 45,419
2007 - 45,774
2008 - 38,858
2009 - 23100
2010 - 23,209
2011 - 23,489
2012 - 14,961
2013 - 13,705
See the pattern, 2003 through the first half of 2005 prices were still increasing rapidly, much more quickly than the number of failed listings, but then the early 2005 rate suddenly jumped by 61% for the 2nd half of the year and jumped jumped 17% higher than that in early 2006 and jumped another 29% higher than that during the last half of 2006.
And since I know you're going to complain about actives, we've already accounted for the closed sales, so adding the expireds and withdrawns will be double counting some of the actives because some properties were listed multiple times before selling.
The point is, you don't get the huge jump in standing inventory until *after* it sinks in that there is no more short-term upside to be gained. Which goes back to the point I was making earlier that the big gains in standing inventory are a lagging indicator to a declining trend, not a leading indicator.
The reduction in expireds/withdrawns drops prior to the recovery which started to poke up in 2012. I.e. *leading* that trend for increase.