Sale settled post Effective date, prior to report date

[ZZGAMAZZ]

Unit B is a Model Match from the same complex, also Listed for Sale and was pending as of the effective date of the report. Sale B was utilized as a Listing comparable.
Newly settled sale is 11% below my AV and 19% below the subject PP. I feel it is significant.

11-19% is significant. I think I would seriously consider lowering my OMV based on that.
They're asking you to reconsider, how can you ignore that? How do you say your OMV is unchanged?

A recent similar thread included a peer perspective that to accept a comp(s) provided in a ROV is cool, but to revise one's original Opinion of Value admits to an error that exposes the appraiser to a possible state sanction by admitting a mistake/oversight. Peer comments?

 

[bnmappraisal]

A recent similar thread included a peer perspective that to accept a comp(s) provided in a ROV is cool, but to revise one's original Opinion of Value admits to an error that exposes the appraiser to a possible state sanction by admitting a mistake/oversight. Peer comments?

It depends on the mistake/oversight
If new information/data comes up from an ROV that, for whatever reason, the original search did not turn up, then that data should be analyzed and used in the ROV
If that means the original opinion of market value changes? So be it