• Welcome to AppraisersForum.com, the premier online  community for the discussion of real estate appraisal. Register a free account to be able to post and unlock additional forums and features.

SOW: FHA-level Site Inspection

Status
Not open for further replies.

ZZGAMAZZ

Elite Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2007
Professional Status
Certified Residential Appraiser
State
California
I have been advised by an appraiser whose opinions I greatly respect that a lending client might legitimately require FHA type propoerty inspection and corresponding comments for a Jumbo reverse mortgage.

I'm cool with that, from a business perspective, but don't know where I should describe that SOW activity. I asked a few months ago but need to do so again: Do peers provide a specific narrative section of each Form report entitled "Scope of Work," or is the SOW comprised of the appraisal process that is described throughout the report?

To paraphrase Paul Simon, I'm "still confused after all these years."
 
Scope of the Work:
This report represents our good faith effort to comply with the requirements of USPAP (Uniform​
Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice) as found in the current applicable issue. These standards​
contain rules and requirements that deal with the procedures to be followed in developing an appraisal,​
analysis, or opinion of value.​
The determination as to whether or not this, or any, report complies with USPAP cannot be​
considered to be an objective fact. Compliance is rather a subjective determination which is based upon the​
perception and interpretation by the client and review appraiser as to what constitutes compliance.​
The "Appraisal Process" is used to estimate Market Value of the subject. The appraisal or​
"Valuation Process" follows these steps; 1.) identify and describe the real estate being appraised; 2.) state the​
real property interest being appraised; 3.) State the purpose and intended use of the appraisal; 4.) define the​
value to be estimated; 5.) state the effective date of the report and appraisal; 6.) state the extent of the process​
of collecting, confirming, and reporting data; 7.) state all assumptions and limiting conditions that affect the​
analysis, opinions, and conclusions; 8.) describe the information considered, the appraisal procedures​
followed, and the reasoning that supports the analyses, opinions, and conclusions. 9.) describe the appraiser's​
opinion of the highest and best use of the real estate, when such an opinion is necessary and appropriate; 10.)​
explain and support the exclusion of any of the usual valuation approaches; 11.) describe any additional​
information that may be appropriate to show compliance with the guidelines of Standard 1 of the USPAP;​
and, 12.) include a signed certification in accordance with Standards Rule 2 - 3.​
The depth and detail of the process of collecting, confirming, and reporting the salient facts of this​
appraisal include the researching of pertinent general and specific data obtained during the property​
Page 20​
inspection of the subject. A legal description was provided by the client or obtained in the local court​
records. Property tax data were obtained in the assessor's compiled records obtained on the internet. A​
five year history of ownership was researched in the history section of the assessment property tax cards.​
The appraiser regularly practices in this market and maintains records of that practice typical in the area and​
typical of my peers. The appraiser accesses the ----various MLS & sources---- and, in addition to---- Deeds and mortgages​
Information that is provided through brokers in the subject area, and personal records of collected data supplement our records.​
(checkboxes below did not 'copy')
Specifically, the appraiser inspected the property​
9 interior & exterior : exterior only 9 did not inspect personally​
The primary property improvements were measured by the appraiser using​
: assessment records : measurement by appraiser (2013 report)​
: statement of the owner 9 from prior report sketch​
Square footages of small outbuildings were estimated by​
: assessment records 9 measurement by appraiser​
9 statement of the owner : from prior report sketch​
I did interview the owner, Roxanna ******* and relied upon my prior appraisal and her statements for​
information. I also obtained information of the sale of a----------------------omit-----------------------.​
The appraiser is qualified by experience and / or education to perform the​
assignment. The appraiser disclosed any lack of knowledge and any assistance provided by a third party and​
what steps were taken to comply with the competency provisions, as necessary.​
Unless otherwise stated, the following information was unavailable to the appraiser; 1.) The loan-to value​
ratio, interest rate, term and discounts, if any, applicable to the subject mortgage; 2.) the copy of a​
perimeter survey of the subject; 3.) copies of previous appraisal reports on the subject; 4.) copies of any​
leases, lease addenda, or lease or sales options; 5.) a copy of any tenant register or rent roll of the subject​
property, or; 6.) a copy of any soils report; environmental audit, survey, or site assessment; health department​
report; mechanics lien; or preliminary abstract report that may have been performed.​
The appraisal "inspection" is a value inspection and is no substitute for an engineering inspection.​
Page 21​
The highest and best use of the subject is projected based upon location, physical characteristics,​
past and proposed uses, and applicable zoning. Each of the three accepted valuation methods have been​
examined in this report. Any approach eliminated is explained under that section.​
The Replacement Cost New (RCN), if used, was obtained from the current National Building Cost​
Guide Manual. Life expectancy tables may be utilized public sources or books referenced above or calculated​
by mathematical methods, ------omitted------. Owner interview is used to determine building specifications in​
the absence of written ones. These items are held in work file as available.​
Entrepreneurial incentive represent the amount an entrepreneur expects to receive as compensation for providing​
coordination, expertise, and assuming the risks associated with development of a project. Part of the "soft​
costs" of the cost method, this entrepreneurial profit is often minimal or non-existent on rural and owner​
constructed properties. In turnkey bids that incentive is often shown as a direct payment to a person or​
persons in charge of construction coordination. Owner contracted buildings such as barns or shop buildings​
often represent little or no market reaction for entrepreneurial profit. Unless otherwise specified, soft costs​
(construction interest, entrepreneurial profit, architectural fees, building permits, etc.) are included in the base​
costs per Square foot. Such cost estimates are not a substitute for competent estimators with complete​
working drawings. Estimating costs is not an exact science and there is room for legitimate disagreement of​
what the "right" cost is. The appraisers estimate is not intended to be a substitute for professional judgment​
or as a replacement for sound engineering cost estimating, but is merely an aid to developing an informed​
opinion of value.​
Accrued depreciation is estimated by the age-life or straight line method. This method takes the ratio​
of effective age to total economic life with the resulting percentage multiplied by the replacement cost new to​
arrive at the dollar estimate of accrued depreciation. Comparable land sales are examined to estimate the​
market value of the land "as if vacant." Sales write ups are held in our files. Land value is added to the​
depreciated cost new (DCN) of improvements to arrive at the indicated value of the subject by the cost​
approach. Cost related adjustments in the sales comparison approach is based upon my analysis of costs for​
comparable properties.​
Comparable improved sales were examined and analyzed for use in estimating the market value of​
the improved subject property. The unit of comparison is price per unit or dollars. The sales were compared​
to subject improved tract and adjustments were made for differences. An adjustment grid or ranking table is​
provided to assist the reader in understanding the reasoning behind adjustment applied. Items superior to​
the subject were adjusted downwards and items inferior to the subject were adjusted upwards based upon the​
comparative cost analysis methods, paired sales analysis, sensitivity analysis, and by extraction of values, as​
described in The Appraisal of Real Estate​
Page 22​
As needed, market rents are extracted from market data. See approach for details.​
Finally, the valuation indications are reconciled into a final estimate of defined value based upon the​
accuracy, quantity, and appropriateness of the data gathered in my investigation.​
 
Terrel's suggestion would work... no doubt about that. It's also overkill. You do not have to detail your SOW. You need to summarize it. Whatever you are using now... you can just add a statement that your inspection was conducted in accordance with FHA standards.... or something like that.

Of course, if you want to say more... you can.
 
I have been advised by an appraiser whose opinions I greatly respect that a lending client might legitimately require FHA type propoerty inspection and corresponding comments for a Jumbo reverse mortgage.

I'm cool with that, from a business perspective, but don't know where I should describe that SOW activity. I asked a few months ago but need to do so again: Do peers provide a specific narrative section of each Form report entitled "Scope of Work," or is the SOW comprised of the appraisal process that is described throughout the report?

To paraphrase Paul Simon, I'm "still confused after all these years."
I've done two recently that were jumbos that required FHA level inspection/observation. I simply stated an FHA level observation was performed, but the assignment was not FHA. ....I included the usual ....the subject property currently meets or exceeds FHA/HUD minimum requirements as set forth by Handbook 4000.1, etc. etc. Be sure not to include a case number or you will get the attention of an anal underwriter. *lol* I'm considering returning to including a CHUMS # just to repel the old blue haired reviewers. :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Find a Real Estate Appraiser - Enter Zip Code

Copyright © 2000-, AppraisersForum.com, All Rights Reserved
AppraisersForum.com is proudly hosted by the folks at
AppraiserSites.com
Back
Top