• Welcome to AppraisersForum.com, the premier online  community for the discussion of real estate appraisal. Register a free account to be able to post and unlock additional forums and features.

TAF paid over 500K to the Law Firm trying to destroy Shane Lanham

Status
Not open for further replies.
it is a sad day to see TAF rolling over to the political whims of the unethical stakeholders...
 
When you drum up some actual evidence that the TAF was actively working against Shane Lanham let me know. Nothing in the evidence shows exactly what the law firm did for TAF. Law firms... at least successful ones.... usually have many clients amd each client has their own interests and objectives. The lawyer's job is to represent the interests of the client.
 
When you drum up some actual evidence that the TAF was actively working against Shane Lanham let me know. Nothing in the evidence shows exactly what the law firm did for TAF. Law firms... at least successful ones.... usually have many clients amd each client has their own interests and objectives. The lawyer's job is to represent the interests of the client.
See Post #1, #2, and #3.
 
What wrong signals did Shane gave to initiate a lawsuit? :unsure:
The 1004MC in his report sure didn't do him any favors. It showed an increasing market while he chose stable in the report. His opinion of value is approximately 14% below the lowest median sale in the MC (out of 30 something sales).

Then he used some boilerplate commentary stating the MC data was not to be relied upon... without stating how he concluded the market was stable.

I don't think the dude is racist....it's just a poorly supported report.
 
The 1004MC in his report sure didn't do him any favors. It showed an increasing market while he chose stable in the report. His opinion of value is approximately 14% below the lowest median sale in the MC (out of 30 something sales).

Then he used some boilerplate commentary stating the MC data was not to be relied upon... without stating how he concluded the market was stable.

I don't think the dude is racist....it's just a poorly supported report.
Geez....
I thought it was one of my reports.... :)
 
When you drum up some actual evidence that the TAF was actively working against Shane Lanham let me know. Nothing in the evidence shows exactly what the law firm did for TAF. Law firms... at least successful ones.... usually have many clients amd each client has their own interests and objectives. The lawyer's job is to represent the interests of the client.

public trust and for profit cannot mix...they will love one and hate the other
 
The 1004MC in his report sure didn't do him any favors. It showed an increasing market while he chose stable in the report. His opinion of value is approximately 14% below the lowest median sale in the MC (out of 30 something sales).

Then he used some boilerplate commentary stating the MC data was not to be relied upon... without stating how he concluded the market was stable.

I don't think the dude is racist....it's just a poorly supported report.

geez surfer dude...the appraisal wasn't that bad...anyways, the lender and the borrowers had options. no one pinned them to that number...

anyways

if any mistake was made, it was not researching the borrower enough...currently i am asking for i.d. at every appraisal and doing a google search on the borrower so not to fret

:rof: :rof: :rof:
 
When you drum up some actual evidence that the TAF was actively working against Shane Lanham let me know. Nothing in the evidence shows exactly what the law firm did for TAF. Law firms... at least successful ones.... usually have many clients amd each client has their own interests and objectives. The lawyer's job is to represent the interests of the client.
Passively working againt.
 
The 1004MC in his report sure didn't do him any favors. It showed an increasing market while he chose stable in the report. His opinion of value is approximately 14% below the lowest median sale in the MC (out of 30 something sales).

Then he used some boilerplate commentary stating the MC data was not to be relied upon... without stating how he concluded the market was stable.

I don't think the dude is racist....it's just a poorly supported report.
It could have all the support and he would still be being sued for not using the 2% "industry standard" for busy roads adjustment.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Find a Real Estate Appraiser - Enter Zip Code

Copyright © 2000-, AppraisersForum.com, All Rights Reserved
AppraisersForum.com is proudly hosted by the folks at
AppraiserSites.com
Back
Top