• Welcome to AppraisersForum.com, the premier online community for the discussion of real estate appraisal. Register a free account to be able to post and unlock additional forums and features.

Freddie Mac: Quality & Condition Ratings

Status
Not open for further replies.
The AI software for Q and C ratings for UAD is better suited for AVM's-
 
J Grant said:
The AI software for Q and C ratings for UAD is better suited for AVM's-
Click to expand...

I essentially use percentage worse, from 0.00%-100.00%. The accuracy is needed in the lower and higher ranges of quality where the value/% curve can get very steep downwards or upwards. And I can get market reaction to ultra low and ultra high condition/quality rankings like no other method can.
 
The ratings I came up with are Q2 = custom, typically new construction here Q3 = brick/hardie/stone Q4 = siding then I explain it in the addendum. C1 = new, C2 = 1-2 years old and C3 = 3 to 40ish. A typical home here is C4 if built in the 70s or older that hasn't been remodeled. At the bottom of the grid in an empty data field I make upgrade adjustments after looking at interior pics on MLS. It's kind of shocking how many appraisers don't look at comp's interior pics. In Total I will also look at Smart Exchange to see what my peers are doing where I frequently see missed items or mistakes. The listing for this particular comp says interior townhouse in reality it's a new construction end unit but 2 or 3 appraisers still marked it interior. Rear decks/patios/porches even a pool was missing on some peers grids I looked at on this exchange a few days ago.

Screenshot 2024-12-10 135729.png
 
Last edited:
How do you derive/measure upgrade adjustments?
 
I use no upgrades, avg upgrades, updated, renovated, remodeled and premium upgrade for new construction then sensitivity to derive the adjustments. I may make condition only adjustments if the property is in bad condition then none below or vise versa.
 
I put this in my reports and reference which method I use

1733932395679.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Digger88 said:
The ratings I came up with are Q2 = custom, typically new construction here Q3 = brick/hardie/stone Q4 = siding then I explain it in the addendum. C1 = new, C2 = 1-2 years old and C3 = 3 to 40ish. A typical home here is C4 if built in the 70s or older that hasn't been remodeled. At the bottom of the grid in an empty data field I make upgrade adjustments after looking at interior pics on MLS. It's kind of shocking how many appraisers don't look at comp's interior pics. In Total I will also look at Smart Exchange to see what my peers are doing where I frequently see missed items or mistakes. The listing for this particular comp says interior townhouse in reality it's a new construction end unit but 2 or 3 appraisers still marked it interior. Rear decks/patios/porches even a pool was missing on some peers grids I looked at on this exchange a few days ago.

View attachment 94536
Click to expand...

These C/Q ratings are just for the GSEs. They should not be used for making adjustments. They are indeed useless for that in most neighborhoods within the SF Bay Area - or really most of Northern California, per my experience.
 
Digger88 said:
The ratings I came up with are Q2 = custom, typically new construction here Q3 = brick/hardie/stone Q4 = siding then I explain it in the addendum. C1 = new, C2 = 1-2 years old and C3 = 3 to 40ish. A typical home here is C4 if built in the 70s or older that hasn't been remodeled. At the bottom of the grid in an empty data field I make upgrade adjustments after looking at interior pics on MLS. It's kind of shocking how many appraisers don't look at comp's interior pics. In Total I will also look at Smart Exchange to see what my peers are doing where I frequently see missed items or mistakes. The listing for this particular comp says interior townhouse in reality it's a new construction end unit but 2 or 3 appraisers still marked it interior. Rear decks/patios/porches even a pool was missing on some peers grids I looked at on this exchange a few days ago.

View attachment 94536
Click to expand...
Questons/comments:
1) why describe improvemets/upgrades on a separat line item at the bottom when those factors are integral to the UAD condition ratings, with condition-based adjustments providing the salient source of adjustments in virtually all of my reports
2) I find it hard to belive that ANY APPRAISER would fail to thoroughly review MLS data; in fact I copy/paste the marketing narrative of every comp into the SCA addendum, rather than to piecemeal together a paraphrased description of the MLS comments--only problem being that the spell-checker as well as the current appropriate-phrase-hall-monitor includes those verbatim comments in the review process.
3) Kinda moot, however, if the current thread that pertains to volume of mortgage assignments is true...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Find a Real Estate Appraiser - Enter Zip Code

Copyright © 2000-, AppraisersForum.com, All Rights Reserved
AppraisersForum.com is proudly hosted by the folks at AppraiserSites.com
Back
Top