J Grant
Elite Member
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2003
- Professional Status
- Certified Residential Appraiser
- State
- Florida
YOU don't see increaxed risk, but WE do, and we are appraisers stuck with it. And or us, it is about decreased credibility and our own reliance on 3rd party info being denied our own inspection when we are the ones stuck with the value for five years or longerThat's the thing, we don't see "at the loss of so much else". We do not see increased risk with hybrid appraisals based on the 300k+ we have to analyze. And yes, we've compared them to traditional appraisals we have on the same properties. If we can create a more efficient process without increasing the risk of the loan, why would we not embrace that, especially during high volume markets?
We monitor all valuation types very closely many different ways. If we see increased risk, we adjust to mitigate it and that would include shutting a program down if it couldn’t be mitigated.
The argument GSEs mount is about THEIR risk, not the investors' risk, not the borrowers' risk, not the risk to the appraisal profession. The appraiser is who they are because of a combination and integration of field experience and data analysis, not one or the other alone - which will happen after a new generation gets fast food cut up version of assignments
Wrt to "Risk" - What does it see on the top of a URAR for, as the purpose of the appraisal? To form an opinion for of market value for lending purposes- a front-end value purpose, not a back-end risk purpose that you tack on .