I was reviewing until a year ago. The last report was so bad I was embarrassed for the writer. Clearly had been trained to pull from software (all of which was credited in the addenda) that loads tons of CYA and random data that was not only grossly inappropriate but rendered incorrect results. The appraiser didn't know what she didn't know. If the majority of appraisals are now populated by a software program and signed by a poorly trained appraiser why pay for them? I trained when you pulled comps from books, there was no program to write the report for me, I had to understand what I was doing and why I was doing it. Doesn't seem to be the way anymore, in much of anything IMO.What kind of work have you been doing lately? Are you engaged in appraisal review ? Outside of reviewers, few appraisers see each other's work except on stray occasions.
If some appraisers dump software click results into a report, it is the result of the AMC industry, including it from time and fee constraints. The fact that the AMs amassed so much power and control, of course, has been the topic of threads and is the subject of discussion.
But even an appraisal that uses some click from software results is not the same as an AVM, though I understand the analogy.