Problematic Words

[djd09]

Trump signs executive order putting pressure on big banks over 'politicized debanking'

The order ups the administration's scrutiny over whether banks denied services to consumers and businesses based on political or religious grounds.

... government control through the banks ... wrong thoughts ... thought crimes

 

[glenn walker]

Glenn has submitted and enjoins us all to give up too.

Not at all it's just not a Constitutional Law issue that Djd continues repeating for years on here. If it was true he and others should sue in a Federal Court to enforce the free speech law.

The problem is appraisers lose credibility when others read this claim and it's kinda like the Sovereign Citizens Claim that you don't need a driver's licence because the Constitution says traveling doesn't require a license. That's true if your walking or riding a horse but not operating a motor powered vehicle.

The same with WORDS and appraisers free speech one can tell the GSEs to go
F OFF that's okay you just can't write it in your report they won't purchase the loan.

 

[djd09]

someone needs to tell the cheerleaders that biden lost..

 

[George Hatch]

Whomever they put up next is going to pursue the same program, and you know it.

 

[glenn walker]

If it was Unconstitutional someone after three decade's or more would have taken it to the Federal Court's.

 

[djd09]

obviously there will never be a safe space big enough....

 

[George Hatch]

That's right. Nobody is coming to protect appraisers from our critics. Our defense is all on us, by ourselves.

 

[djd09]

it might pain you...but biden lost

 

[djd09]

42 U.S. Code § 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights​

• U.S. Code
• Notes

prev | next
Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer’s judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia.

read and weep...

 

[glenn walker]

42 U.S. Code § 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights​

• U.S. Code
• Notes

prev | next
Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer’s judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia.

read and weep...

Has nothing Zero to do with the topic at hand and your just spitting into the wind. The Ship Sailed.