• Welcome to AppraisersForum.com, the premier online  community for the discussion of real estate appraisal. Register a free account to be able to post and unlock additional forums and features.

Two recent policy developments are shaping the future of mortgage lending.

Tom D

Elite Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
May 22, 2015
Professional Status
Certified Residential Appraiser
State
Pennsylvania
from Appraise Now magazine:
Bank Capital Proposal Creates Opportunity to Reinforce the Value of Appraisals
Two recent policy developments are shaping the future of mortgage lending—and creating an important opportunity for the appraisal profession to engage.

Federal bank regulators have proposed changes to capital rules that would more directly tie a mortgage’s risk level to its loan-to-value (LTV) ratio. In practical terms, that means the relationship between the loan amount and the market value of the property would play a larger role in how lenders assess risk and allocate capital.

Even small differences in appraised value may shift a loan into a different LTV category, potentially affecting how costly that loan is for a bank to hold. This framework reinforces a core principle long understood by appraisers: Credible, well-supported valuations are essential to sound lending decisions.

At the same time, a recent executive order on housing and mortgage credit calls for reducing the regulatory burden and expanding access to credit, including modernizing appraisal processes. That effort may encourage greater use of appraisal waivers, automated valuation models, and other alternatives in appropriate cases.

Taken together, these developments highlight both change and opportunity.

While some lower-risk, lower-LTV loans may move toward more streamlined valuation approaches, the increased emphasis on LTV in capital rules strengthens the case for accurate, independent appraisals where risk matters most. As lenders become more sensitive to how valuation affects capital and pricing, the need for reliable collateral assessment becomes clearer, not weaker.















 
  • Like
Reactions: Zoe
from Appraise Now magazine:
Bank Capital Proposal Creates Opportunity to Reinforce the Value of Appraisals
Do you have a link to the article online?

Sounds as if someone has a head on their shoulders....reducing the regulatory burden is a disaster waiting to happen. Things need to tighten up, not loosen up.
 
Last edited:
In other words, low FICO, high LTV, sketchy job history, no assets....full appraisal (theoretically). Not that a full or any appraisal will help when/if a deadbeat quits paying the mortgage but it might lower the risk profile a bit.

Or, high FICO, low LTV, good job history, substantial assets...waiver. Basically, a signature loan.


Not rocket science here, folks. Glad they finally thought this thru.
 
In other words, low FICO, high LTV, sketchy job history, no assets....full appraisal (theoretically). Not that a full or any appraisal will help when/if a deadbeat quits paying the mortgage but it might lower the risk profile a bit.

Or, high FICO, low LTV, good job history, substantial assets...waiver. Basically, a signature loan.


Not rocket science here, folks. Glad they finally thought this thru.
Ugh, everything is cyclical. It used to be the appraisal was an equal component of all mortgage transactions. Credit score, ability to pay, supported collateral. Then it went to credit score based lending which helped lead to the mortgage meltdown. Now its making the slow sweep back. its like the past never happened.
 
Do you have a link to the article online?

Until next week,
Team Appraisal Institute

Team Appraisal Institute
 
Then it went to credit score based lending which helped lead to the mortgage meltdown.
Lending to people with bad credit scores, people that could barely fog a mirror and that had no job helped the meltdown, along with a few dozen other reasons, the primary one being Wall Street greed. The best and most in-depth appraisal did nothing to prevent deadbeats from walking away from the mortgage and causing massive losses to lenders.

Lending to people with good credit and jobs and that had common sense and modicum of personal responsibility didn't even move the needle on the crash meter.
 
Lending to people with bad credit scores, people that could barely fog a mirror and that had no job helped the meltdown, along with a few dozen other reasons, the primary one being Wall Street greed. The best and most in-depth appraisal did nothing to prevent deadbeats from walking away from the mortgage and causing massive losses to lenders.

Lending to people with good credit and jobs and that had common sense and modicum of personal responsibility didn't even move the needle on the crash meter.
The credit based lending model was doomed because people in general are greedy. The A paper lenders were using sub prime lending models without accounting for risk. They were assuming that if you had a good credit score, then you were A-OK. They had stated income programs with no follow up for income verification.

I had worked the sub prime mortgage market prior to all of this and could not believe that banks were doing what they did. Sub prime lenders bake the default rate into loan programs. A paper lenders did not, and it appears are still not. A paper lenders wanted some of the $$ the sub prime lenders were making, but did not follow a good business model. We the people paid the price for the lender greediness.
 
Sounds like an aspirational wish list, since the article contradicts itself - how can valuations be said to be gaining more importance for lending, while at the same time waivers are accepted where the lender estimates the value based on what they need to get the loan approved? (a recent Fannie statement was that $ amount might not reflect the value of the property )



Fannie Mae
(now using the term "Value Acceptance" instead of appraisal waiver) acknowledges that the value submitted by a lender and accepted in this process might not represent the actual market value of the property.
annie Mae +2
Key points regarding this statement include:
  • Definition of Value: When Value Acceptance is exercised, Fannie Mae accepts the lender-provided value (usually the purchase price or estimated refinance value) as the basis for the loan, but does not warrant that this amount represents the actual market value, condition, or marketability of the property.
  • Purpose of Waiver: The waiver is designed to minimize required collateral due diligence for eligible transactions, not to guarantee the accuracy of the home's value.
  • Warranties on Value: Fannie Mae does not warrant the lender's estimated value as the final market value.
  • Lender Responsibility: The lender makes property-related representations and warranties as of the time it delivers the loan to Fannie Mae.
    annie Mae Single Family +4
The shift from the term "appraisal waiver" to "value acceptance" (as of 2023–2025 updates) highlights that the process is focused on accepting a provided valuation, not conducting a new, formal valuation.
annie Mae Single Family +1












 
Last edited:
Find a Real Estate Appraiser - Enter Zip Code

Copyright © 2000-, AppraisersForum.com, All Rights Reserved
AppraisersForum.com is proudly hosted by the folks at
AppraiserSites.com
Back
Top