The 3 sold comps in the subject PUD sold for $459K, $465K, and $470K based on contracts 1, 18, and 24 months ago; the one same-PUD comp that is pending sale is listed at $538K; and the OV is $480K--although the selling prices [AKA Unadjusted Values] have no bearing when the OV is being determined, based both on USPAP and FNMAE standards. The subject was listed at $490K then reduced to $460K after just one week, and is under contract at $452K. The three solds comps in competing PUDs with much more recent contract dates, adjust to $476K, $478K, and $495K. Plenty of support for the OV, despite sparse market info, but also plenty of irregular listing activity to ignore; and the "seller refuses to make lender-required repairs" stance presumably is the reason for the drastic drop in listing price and the corresponding offer that ostensibly is far below market, and far below the OV, unless I would factor in the unknown reason for the decreased list price as an adjustment to all comps, although factors that affect the subject sale aren't used to adjust the comps--ergo the reason I posted on the AF, although smart *** responses like #21 above kinda leads one to realize why the public hates appraisers....