J Grant
Elite Member
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2003
- Professional Status
- Certified Residential Appraiser
- State
- Florida
I understand the difference between a tool and an algorithm. You used a tool to crunch the math, but you vetted sales, picked them, and developed a spreadsheet. Appraisers with the right software can have their vetting, analysis, and comp selection done with the most cursory, minimal input from the appraiser. (if an appraiser wants to cheat in that manner)o.Don't conflate algorithms with tools. If an algorithm is picking the data, deciding what analysis will be conducted and spitting out a rate, with the appraiser having no understanding where that number came from, that is very different from an appraiser using something to analyze data that the appraiser selected. When I did group data analysis I had spreadsheets set up to analyze data I extracted from my local MLS. The fact that I did not do the math by hand does not diminish the results.![]()
The problem is that the software now is not just a tool, it can be used to do the appraiser;s work for them with minimal input from the appraiser (if an appraiser wants to cheat in that manner) The question then is, what oversight will there be to identifiy it or hold accountable appraisers who do it?
Without oversight, the cheating can rise to mass scale because it will be hard to identify when an appraiser did so, and the economic system rewards it.

