Carnivore
Elite Member
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2002
- Professional Status
- Certified Residential Appraiser
- State
- North Carolina
I think I am beginning to grasp why this has been brought to the forefront.
AO2 is AO2. Doesn't matter what USPAP version(year). been around. It is a common problem because of the potential SOW issues. Also another issue is AO 26 readdressing. Again this could be a SOW issue and now throw in Confidentiality and other related issues.
So it's all coming down to cost of our services. Yes, every one is paying attention to cost. Yes, they want to beat us up on our fee's. I am not opposed to reducing my fee for a loyal client or a new Direct assignment client . OTOH I don't give a rats patooey about the AMC Leeches. Like GH has said above as long as the Client agrees to that retrospective Inspection date and you include the below everything is cool. It is their risk to take.
Say what you do, do what you say.
I quote GH "I did not personally inspect this property for this assignment. I did previously inspect the interior/exterior of the property on 03/12/2023 while performing a previous appraisal assignment. This appraisal is based in part on the assumption that the property attributes and conditions have not significantly changed in the interim. If this assumption is incorrect it would have an effect on my opinions and conclusions."
So how far back is reasonable? Since lenders are from almost any state now. They may not know what is happening or happened in your market. Sure they can see stuff on a national level. It is their risk to take. The house may not even exist anymore due to a weather event or a house fire. Google Earth does not update daily. Again, so sorry not my problem.
Side Question: I have never seen a Property Data Report aka pdr. Does it have the date Harry inspected the subject? My guess is it doesn't. I think thats problematic. I mean since everyone is getting cost conscious, it would not surprise me to learn these PDR's can begin to get quite old.
AO2 is AO2. Doesn't matter what USPAP version(year). been around. It is a common problem because of the potential SOW issues. Also another issue is AO 26 readdressing. Again this could be a SOW issue and now throw in Confidentiality and other related issues.
So it's all coming down to cost of our services. Yes, every one is paying attention to cost. Yes, they want to beat us up on our fee's. I am not opposed to reducing my fee for a loyal client or a new Direct assignment client . OTOH I don't give a rats patooey about the AMC Leeches. Like GH has said above as long as the Client agrees to that retrospective Inspection date and you include the below everything is cool. It is their risk to take.
Say what you do, do what you say.
I quote GH "I did not personally inspect this property for this assignment. I did previously inspect the interior/exterior of the property on 03/12/2023 while performing a previous appraisal assignment. This appraisal is based in part on the assumption that the property attributes and conditions have not significantly changed in the interim. If this assumption is incorrect it would have an effect on my opinions and conclusions."
So how far back is reasonable? Since lenders are from almost any state now. They may not know what is happening or happened in your market. Sure they can see stuff on a national level. It is their risk to take. The house may not even exist anymore due to a weather event or a house fire. Google Earth does not update daily. Again, so sorry not my problem.
Side Question: I have never seen a Property Data Report aka pdr. Does it have the date Harry inspected the subject? My guess is it doesn't. I think thats problematic. I mean since everyone is getting cost conscious, it would not surprise me to learn these PDR's can begin to get quite old.
Last edited: