- Joined
- Jan 15, 2002
- Professional Status
- Certified General Appraiser
- State
- California
TBH, in that price range the $100k or $120k difference wouldn't surprise me at all.
LOL. And $90/SF does not seem any more plausible. SMHAll I know is $45 per SF adjustment for condo unit in a high-rise selling above 700 per SF doesn't sound right to me.
Our building has 3 - 3 bedrooms and the rest are two bedrooms, the rest of the buildings in same location along beach are all 2 bedroomsDid either appraisal have a 3 bedroom sale?
LOL. And $90/SF does not seem any more plausible. SMH
most of the buildings do not allow weekly, its rare to see a summer rental in a condo hereIt probably makes sense to develop the income approach for a condo on the beach. At least look at rents for clues to adjustments.
Well......there's a big stick in the spokes. LolOur building has 3 - 3 bedrooms and the rest are two bedrooms, the rest of the buildings in same location along beach are all 2 bedrooms
most of the buildings do not allow weekly, its rare to see a summer rental in a condo here
Without reading your full post, my feeling 1b->2b, there is about 10% value difference even sq ft is similar because use will be huge difference, 2b->3b, 10% again, 3b+, probably only $30K~$40K difference per bedroom here.Looking for some help in Maine. We have a condo on the beach that we inherited, are trying to determine the value and then one buy the others out. we have two appraisals from licensed appraisers. one makes sense, the other seems to have funky assumptions. we have agreed on three and take the average. but the funky assumptions on appraisal two has caused us to pause.
this is a condo in a small high rise, there are about 10 of these small (7-10 story) high rises along the beach. most all are two bedrooms, just a few three bedrooms in the area. We have three bedrooms.
both appraisers used the same comp of a recent sale in the building...
other unit sold for 850,000 - this unit is 2 bedroom, 2 bath, 1152 sq ft.
our unit is 3 bedroom, 2 bath, 1525 sq ft.
Appraiser A - added $20,000 for 3rd bedroom and $33,200 for sq footage.
Appraiser B - added $100,000 for 3rd bedroom and $18,500 for sq footage
Appraiser A - report says:
Based on a sensitivity analysis of comparable paired sales in the marketplace, adjustments were applied to the following physical characteristics: Gross Living Area Above Grade (GLAAG) at $90 per square foot, Bedrooms at $20k, Full Bathrooms at $8K, Garages at $8K per space, and fireplaces at $3,500.
Adjustments for differences in construction quality, if made, were based on the Marshall & Swift Residential CostHandbook, modified for the open market and local area. Adjustments for differences in condition, if made, were the costs estimated to cure those differences based on market perception; they are NOT dollar-for-dollar.
Appraiser B - report says
The last 3 bedroom unit to sell at same building was unit 2A. It sold for $490,000 on 11/16/2017. A 2 bedroom unit sold for $375,000 on 10/27/2017. This indicates a difference of $115,000. After adjusting for gross living area, an indicated value forthe difference between a 2 bedroom unit and a 3 bedroom unit was approximately $100,000.
Appraiser B - seems off base with the statement and it is sort of arbitrary to calculate for a 3rd bedroom that way. Additionally there was a major special assessment (over $100k) that came up right after the sale in 2017 and we know there was litigation regarding lack of disclosure regarding the assessment.
there are some other gross inaccuracies in Appraiser B report - but this is the most glaring.
is Appraiser B correct in making an assumption like above?