hastalavista
Elite Member
- Joined
- May 16, 2005
- Professional Status
- Certified General Appraiser
- State
- California
If you go back to post 613 I think it was and read choice #4, you'll see that was a consideration. The fact is, something is wrong, and before I submit the report, I aim to figure it out.
Good- we can agree with this at least!
And, your point four (which I did read) summed up my argument; if the data is contrary to what was presumed (location was perceived to be different but evidence to the contrary (in this case, income) exists), then the presumption may not be true- and an adjustment would not be warranted or supported.
