KinIL
Sophomore Member
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2005
- Professional Status
- General Public
- State
- Illinois
I'm going to have to agree with some of the other posts that blame is spread accross severeal factors.
A large part of it is that reviews are going through non-local companies and their staff lack geographical competency. Just because they have access to the local MLS doesn't mean that they can discern the different submarkets in a large metropolitan area, therefor they have no idea what relevance a particular check box has.
Prime example being that I just had to rebut a BPO and a review appraisal based on their interpretation of the market. Niether were aware that the subject I was appraising was in a very unique submarket... everywhere else in the town (which is very desirable) lots sell between 3-400k, whereas in the 8x4block submarket the subject was located within, lots sell between 7-800k. This is all despite that rigorously outlined and explained the unique submarket, because of the fact that the BPO came from Florida and the appraisal review came from California...
A large part of it is that reviews are going through non-local companies and their staff lack geographical competency. Just because they have access to the local MLS doesn't mean that they can discern the different submarkets in a large metropolitan area, therefor they have no idea what relevance a particular check box has.
Prime example being that I just had to rebut a BPO and a review appraisal based on their interpretation of the market. Niether were aware that the subject I was appraising was in a very unique submarket... everywhere else in the town (which is very desirable) lots sell between 3-400k, whereas in the 8x4block submarket the subject was located within, lots sell between 7-800k. This is all despite that rigorously outlined and explained the unique submarket, because of the fact that the BPO came from Florida and the appraisal review came from California...
Last edited: