• Welcome to AppraisersForum.com, the premier online  community for the discussion of real estate appraisal. Register a free account to be able to post and unlock additional forums and features.

Accounting for an Easement

Status
Not open for further replies.

CATaxAssessor

Sophomore Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2011
Professional Status
Gvmt Agency, FNMA, HUD, VA etc.
State
California
I am trying to appraise a typical three bedroom, two bath home, 1682 sq. ft., built in 1990, and sits on a .26 acre lot. The issue I have is that this property also has an easement on it. In the legal description it states that the westerly 26' by 100' be set aside as an easement for the property that sits to the rear. The property behind the subject is landlocked and relies on this easement for access. Since none of my comparables have a similar type easement, how would you account for this negative feature or by how much less would you think this property sells for as compared to non-easement properties?
 
If you have no market data concerning easements, how can you say that the easement is a negative feature?

Some questions:

Is the dominant estate responsible for the maintenance of this easement?

Is there a written maintenance agreement for the easement?

Is the rear parcel improved? If so, with what?

If the easement is for ingress and egress does it pass very close to the existing home in a manner that noise and headlights might be an issue?

Is the easement paved, gravel, compacted earth?

If the land that is contained in the easement, was not contained in the easement, what other use would the land be put to?

At minimum, the dominate estate most likely, but not always, is paying RE Taxes on the land within the easement and yet has limited use of it, and can't develop that land. However, when considering setbacks and boundaries, would that land be developable anyway?

Does having a portion of the land contained in the easement change the ratios for developable site/size calculations that might impact highest and best use as improved?

These are just some of the myriad of questions that need to be answered concerning specific properties and specific easements. But, you will still need market data to back up ANY opinion you make concerning whether it is a negative feature, a positive feature or a neutral feature.

You might call a bunch of salespeople and see if they have sold any properties with easements. But you're going to need something if we're not talking parking lots or garden/nursery spaces.


.
 
So there's a driveway through the property.

NBD. Can you tell the difference (by looking at sales) for similar homes on a 11,326 sf lot as opposed to a 8,726 sf lot?

Is this a tax appeal?
 
If you have no market data concerning easements, how can you say that the easement is a negative feature?

I am making an assumption that most buyers would not want an easement that runs through their property.

Some questions:

Is the dominant estate responsible for the maintenance of this easement?

Yes, the subject is responsible for all maintenance of the easement.

Is there a written maintenance agreement for the easement?

Written agreement between the subject and the landlocked parcel to the rear, no there is not. The only written record of it is on the subjects legal description.

Is the rear parcel improved? If so, with what?

Yes the rear parcel has a 2200 sq. ft. manufactured home with a two car garage.

If the easement is for ingress and egress does it pass very close to the existing home in a manner that noise and headlights might be an issue?

Yes it does. The edge of the driveway is about 6 feet from two bedroom windows, one of which is the master bedroom.

Is the easement paved, gravel, compacted earth?

Concrete

If the land that is contained in the easement, was not contained in the easement, what other use would the land be put to?

Most likely a nice big back yard with privacy. The owners would have liked to build an RV garage, but cannot do so without terminating the easement. The is also an elevation issue where the rear parcel sits slightly higher than the subject which eliminates any privacy one would like to have in their back yard.

At minimum, the dominate estate most likely, but not always, is paying RE Taxes on the land within the easement and yet has limited use of it, and can't develop that land. However, when considering setbacks and boundaries, would that land be developable anyway?

That is correct, the subject does pay all the property taxes despite not having full use of it. Currently, it is not developable.

Does having a portion of the land contained in the easement change the ratios for developable site/size calculations that might impact highest and best use as improved?

Highest and best use is as it is. Garage cannot be added nor can the house be expanded to any significant size despite having the land to do so.

These are just some of the myriad of questions that need to be answered concerning specific properties and specific easements. But, you will still need market data to back up ANY opinion you make concerning whether it is a negative feature, a positive feature or a neutral feature.

I agree with you that I need some market data to support any adjustment for this feature. Knowing the property well, I know it has created numerous drawbacks, hence the owners of the subject sold the house so that they could have a private back yard and an RV garage.

You might call a bunch of salespeople and see if they have sold any properties with easements. But you're going to need something if we're not talking parking lots or garden/nursery spaces.
 
Yes, there is a driveway that runs through the parcel.

I have attempted to attach a picture. I apologize in advance because I have not tried attaching photos on this site.
 
See attached
 

Attachments

  • Easement.JPG
    Easement.JPG
    61.1 KB · Views: 27
Try to find sales of flag lots.

I assume your subject is the front lot (the servient tenement). Was this situation existing when they purchased the property?
 
This is from the AH502:

Ownership may be defined as the collection of rights to use and enjoy property. According to
section 103, "[p]roperty includes all matters and things, real, personal, and mixed, capable of
private ownership." Ownership of the fee simple estate is the most complete form of real
property ownership under law and is subject only to the limitations imposed by government:
police power, right to taxation, right to eminent domain, and right of escheat.
All appraisals involve the valuation of a set of defined property rights. With few exceptions, an
appraisal for California property tax purposes involves the valuation of the entire fee simple
estate unencumbered by any private interests (e.g., leases, liens, easements, etc.).8 As a general
rule, private parties cannot reduce the taxable value of their property by imposing private
encumbrances upon it; only enforceable government restrictions under section 402.1 are
recognized as limiting the full fee simple interest. Thus, Rule 2(a) provides, in part:
When applied to real property, the words "full value," "full cash value," "cash
value," "actual value," and "fair market value" mean the prices at which the
unencumbered or unrestricted fee simple interest in the real property (subject to
any legally enforceable governmental restrictions) would transfer for cash or its
equivalent….

For example, a property encumbered with a lease containing rental terms that are below or above
the current economic, or market, rent should be valued as if not so encumbered. As stated in Rule
4(b)(2), the appraiser must
convert the sale price of a property encumbered with a lease to which the property
remained subject to its unencumbered-fee price equivalent by deducting from the
sale price of the seller’s equity the amount by which it is estimated that the lease
enhanced that price or adding to the price of the seller’s equity the amount by
which it is estimated that the lease depressed that price.

An easement is the right of use over the property of another for a specific purpose. Most
easements are not separately recognized for property tax purposes. An exception occurs when the
language contained in the grant of the easement effectively transfers an interest "substantially
equivalent to the value of the fee," thus giving rise to a change in ownership under section 60. In
this case, the easement should be appraised and assessed to the grantee, and the property subject
to the easement should be reappraised in a manner that recognizes the effect of the easement.
Private conditions, covenants, and restrictions (CC&R’s) are private restrictions or encumbrances
that are typically recited in deeds or noted in deeds by reference. Often imposed in residential
subdivisions, CC&R’s have an effect similar to zoning (an enforceable government restriction
under section 402.1) in that they place restrictions on use (e.g., minimum house size
requirements and specification of architectural style). In many cases, they are more restrictive
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Find a Real Estate Appraiser - Enter Zip Code

Copyright © 2000-, AppraisersForum.com, All Rights Reserved
AppraisersForum.com is proudly hosted by the folks at
AppraiserSites.com
Back
Top