2 listings is insufficient data to make a judgment about listings indicating a lowering of prices.
Great question Randolph. In fact, in this case my market trend analysis does show the "Median Sale Price as % of List Price" as slightly over 100% (100.07, to be exact). And the two sales I am referring to in this case are both pending sales. All in all, it's a pretty stable market, and sales prices have remained that way for quite some time here in south central PA. Concessions are there, but are common and are typically in the 2-5% range.
Principle of substitution anyone?
Question: if the principal of substitution is so critical (which in theory I believe to be true) then why shouldn't the appraisal process only include listings since the sold properties are not longer available to purchased?
Because then it would be a price opinion, not a value opinion. The lender client wants to base loan on value priced property....if you were lending 200k to a stranger to buy a house, you would want to know the value, not just a price based on a couple of listings. (buyers are also interested in past sales btw and usually try to find out what things sold for....if not, they are not considered well informed)
As value is based on past sales, reports reflect history. So when it comes to appraisals isn't the principal of substitution some what skewed?