• Welcome to AppraisersForum.com, the premier online  community for the discussion of real estate appraisal. Register a free account to be able to post and unlock additional forums and features.

Adjustment Question

Status
Not open for further replies.

Donna Quixote

Member
Joined
May 23, 2008
Professional Status
Certified Residential Appraiser
State
Wisconsin
I know I should know this, but the more I think about it the more I can't figure it out.

Subject basement is fine
One comparable has a sales concession of $10,000 from seller to buyer to replace the main beam in the basement for needed basement repairs.

Do I adjust down the comp for the $10K in concessions?

Now the reason I keep going over this is that subject basement does not need repair, so when comp is repaired it will be in similar, almost identical, to subject. If the previous owner would have fixed it prior to selling, the sale price would be based on the fact that subject and comparable would virutually be identical.

Sorry, too many long days and this one is just getting me.
:blush:
 
Doesn't really sound like a sales concession but a repair to bring the comp up to accepted market levels. If that is the case, it would be a + adjustment. Remember that the comparables are adjusted towards the subject. If an item is superior it is then a - adjustment.
 
I know I should know this, but the more I think about it the more I can't figure it out.

I am sure you will get other answers to this one and I may be told to look for dictionary or get more training by the usual suspects, but to me it is not a concession. The sale price reflects the comparable being in equal condition to the subject, i.e., not in need of basement repair. I would reflect the sale price of the comp as what it sold for, reflect the condition for this particular aspect of the comp as equal to the subject (because the sale price is based on that), and comment on the money given back for the repair in my SCA narrative. No adjustments required, just explanation.
 
Try a condition positive adjustment to the Subject.

Wayne Tomlinson
 
I see I am outnumbered here, but I don't know why there would be any adjustment. Follow me on this simplistic example.

There are three idential houses and all sold for $500,000 while our subject is also contracted for $500,000.

Doing due diligence we call the agents and we find out that one sale was identical to the subject but needed a new roof and the seller gave $10,000 to have the roof replaced (which was the cost of the roof), while another sale, also idential otherwise, had a basement leak that had a cost of $10,000 which the seller gave to the owner too. The third sale was just like the subject, needing no changes or repairs.

If we made a positive adjustment to comps #1 and #2 then their indicated value is $510,000 and the third sale is $500,000. But in that $510,000 we are counting the condition as inferior while the correction in the condition is already wrapped up in the sale price.

I can see making a $10,000 concession adjustment for repair and then a $10,000 repair adjustment to wash it out. Or, I can see like I said above, not making any adjustment and then explaining it in the comments sections.

But I do not see how the comparable would be adjusted up only, when the money for the repair is already in the sale price. That would be, in the way I am looking at it, similar to double dipping.
 
This is a problem with more than one solution, it depends upon the context.

1) Well joe seller we are willing to offer you the X for the house; however, we want you to fix the beam in the basement first. The counter offer goes, I think the beam is ok; however, if you want it fixed lets move the offer to X+$10,000 and then I'll give you the $10,000 at close (the seller is thinking he still gets X for the property and the buyer is financing the beam repair). How do you know this? Not always, but look to see if the sales price is higher than the list price and was it mentioned to be fixed by the seller and if it wasn't it may have been added to the sale price. If this is the case, the house sold for at least 10k more than it was worth (more if the beam was a definite problem to any buyer), so subract it as a concession because they just loaded it on the sales price and made the house look more valuable than it was to help the borrower. (seller wins, buyer loses)

2) Everyone knew the beam had to be replaced and so in the MLS the listing agent disclosed the beam would be replaced by seller. The buyer sees a house with a "no beam problem", since the seller will fix it, so he will pay the "no problem" house price. This 10k given at the time of close will help a cash strapped seller since he would have trouble affording it prior to sale. The house was sold at the "no problem" price, so you wouldn't want to reduce the price because of this; however, I would disclose this concession (a minus 10k on the concession line) and put in a line item on the grid for this comp for 10k is cost to cure (+10k) these will then cancel each other. To be crafty, just put this in the column that you write in and in the number column just put the word "Offset" next to both items, this will keep your gross adjustments down. (seller loses, buyer is neutral)

3) Nobody knew the beam had a problem, but it was discovered after the house went under contract due to the inspection requirement under within the contract by a home inspector. There was no mention of it in the MLS sales detail and the house sold at or below the last list price. The sales price was already agreed upon when it went under contract at X. Now there is an addendum indicating that because of the beam problem identified, the seller will pay for the cost to repair the beam to the buyer, 10k. The sale price was not changed. The buyer paid the "no problem" price, because they didn't know it had a problem when it went under contract. The MLS readout indicates a 10k concession for repairs. Don't put it in as a concession, just leave it out. You would have to confirm with the listing agent that the price was not reduced due to the concession.

4) Just like 3 above. except in the addendum, they lowered the price by 10k and the buyer would then take care of it (I think this would be rare). There would be no mention of a concession or anything given to the seller on the MLS readout. But if you called to inquire about this property with the listing agent, he might have revealed this problem and why it sold at the lower price. The buyer paid the "problem house" price. You would make an inferior condition adjustment or somewhere else on the grid as a "cost to cure" (+10k) because if it didnt' have this problem, it would have sold for more. You uncovered this with the realtor, because you saw this house adjusted lower than it should have on your grid perhaps, so you called him/her an asked if there were any issues with the property. Seller is loser, buyer is netural).

There can be other scenarious, but context is everything. Sometimes being an appraiser is being a detective and sometimes you need to sleep. I hope I didn't confuse things, because I need sleep too! Good luck!
 
I know I should know this, but the more I think about it the more I can't figure it out.

Subject basement is fine
One comparable has a sales concession of $10,000 from seller to buyer to replace the main beam in the basement for needed basement repairs.

Do I adjust down the comp for the $10K in concessions?

Now the reason I keep going over this is that subject basement does not need repair, so when comp is repaired it will be in similar, almost identical, to subject. If the previous owner would have fixed it prior to selling, the sale price would be based on the fact that subject and comparable would virutually be identical.

Sorry, too many long days and this one is just getting me.
:blush:

Yes, adjust the comparable downwards if the concession is included in the sales price.
 
Concession= -10,000
Condition= + 10000

When a seller pays or gives anything of value it is something conceded
At time of sale (comp) there is a condition difference, thus a condition adjustment

I know cost of repair does not equal value all times-just an example, as it may or may not wash out. The conditon may not be equal to the concession, it could be +/-
This way your report will address both issues you have at hand

Just my opinion and most probably the way I would do it--not that it is the only way to show the issues at hand
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Find a Real Estate Appraiser - Enter Zip Code

Copyright © 2000-, AppraisersForum.com, All Rights Reserved
AppraisersForum.com is proudly hosted by the folks at
AppraiserSites.com
Back
Top