Rich Heyn
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2002
- Professional Status
- Certified General Appraiser
- State
- Michigan
One could argue that whatever term (short sale, arm's length, REO, etc.) is chosen in the drop-down menu "summarizes" the analysis that took place. One could also argue that such a response only "states" the conclusion. If I were in front of a state board, I'd be much more comfortable if my report contained at least a few sentences summarizing my analysis, opinions and conclusions than trying to argue that a two or three word response qualified as a summary. Even though "summarize" and "state" are relatively synonymous, my guess is that most appraisal boards would look at the table in AO-11 for SR 2-2 (a)(viii) and 2-2 (b)(viiii) and determine the UAD drop-down response falls short of a summary. My 2 cents worth.Don't the UAD drop downs in the adjustment table summarize the analysis? They certainly demonstrate that the requirement of SR 1 and SR 1-5 (sale type, financing concessions, type of loan, sale conditions, sale date, contract date, etc.) were complied with and reported. Does SR 2 require a narrative summation? Would a statement of how the appraiser determined the information presented in those drop downs by interview agents, etc. suffice?
View attachment 28712