Brent, et al are probably working on their Phd's. Here are the problems I noticed right out of the gate:
1. So how do they know appraisers are white, black, or green?
3.3. Identifying Appraiser Race
Although the property owner’s race is disclosed in the New Century data, we do not directly observe the race
or ethnicity of the appraiser. However,
we can infer the appraiser’s race and ethnicity using the Bayesian
Improved First Name Surname (BIFS) classifier approach, which is similar in spirit to the methodology used
by regulators to determine consumer race and ethnicity (Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, 2014). As
noted by Ambrose, Conklin, and Lopez (2021), Bayesian-based classification methods have also been used
to infer an individual’s race or ethnicity in various court cases (e.g., Guardians ***’n of N.Y.C. Police Dep’t
v. Civil Serv. Comm’n, 1977).
2. And this is why they should be laughed out of the esteemed "Journal." In the 'work' data they show their graphs, and probably they don't know their R^2's are shown. Their data correlation has R^2s of 0.02 to 0.18. [The GSE's studies on appraiser race discrimination have these similar R^2 0.02 and 0.04 correlations that 'prove' nothing].
3. Well, how significant is their correlation? This is what AI's Perplexity says about correlation:
....................
My best friend has a Phd and my daughter was a candidate, so I know a little about the process. I'm sure these 'finance academics' think they found the Holy Grail (just like the gal from NM), that will move them up the Phd ladder, but I'd be surprised this survives peer review, but who knows what passes as academic intelligence now a days in universities. When I was in high school, when a buddy tried to push something that was obviously false, one of our favorite retorts was, "Keep f-ing that chicken."