ZZGAMAZZ
Elite Member
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2007
- Professional Status
- Certified Residential Appraiser
- State
- California
The subject is located in an upscale location in a city with few sales, so I wish to include comps from a near-by portion of the subject city and identical portions of the two adjacent cities, by comparing results of 3 MLS searches using identical phyical characteristics and the exact same borders--yielding 3 results of the median $/sqft.
So now I know the median$/sqft of each, and the corresponding $ differences/sqft: Subject is Studio City, $1,012/sf. Near-by cities are Sherman Oaks, $838/sf, Beverly Hills, $1,175/sfll.
Should I apply the two different dollar amount adjustments to the selling prices to determine the location adjustment, or do I need to "normalize" the dollar amount to the adjusted values previously determined before the location adjustments were applied, etc., etc.?
Answer more obvious than i realize, also less complex that I have described. Caveat: This analysis isn't necessary but interesting and meaningful IMO.
-------------------- OR, ASKED A DIFFERENT WAY:
I know the $/SF of 3 different locations, which is based upon the selling prices, so it reflects all physical & locational factors.
But because it is expressed as $/SF should the adjustment be applied to GLA (which I presume is how it is best described), or the Location (because that is the basis of the differences), and/or should the adjustments be absolute based on the different $/sqft, or on a relative basis, and if so, as a percentage of the unadjusted selling prices, or as a percentage of the GLA differences, or as a percentage of the difference in lot sizes, etc., etc.? [I thought make the issue easier but maybe not...]
So now I know the median$/sqft of each, and the corresponding $ differences/sqft: Subject is Studio City, $1,012/sf. Near-by cities are Sherman Oaks, $838/sf, Beverly Hills, $1,175/sfll.
Should I apply the two different dollar amount adjustments to the selling prices to determine the location adjustment, or do I need to "normalize" the dollar amount to the adjusted values previously determined before the location adjustments were applied, etc., etc.?
Answer more obvious than i realize, also less complex that I have described. Caveat: This analysis isn't necessary but interesting and meaningful IMO.
-------------------- OR, ASKED A DIFFERENT WAY:
I know the $/SF of 3 different locations, which is based upon the selling prices, so it reflects all physical & locational factors.
But because it is expressed as $/SF should the adjustment be applied to GLA (which I presume is how it is best described), or the Location (because that is the basis of the differences), and/or should the adjustments be absolute based on the different $/sqft, or on a relative basis, and if so, as a percentage of the unadjusted selling prices, or as a percentage of the GLA differences, or as a percentage of the difference in lot sizes, etc., etc.? [I thought make the issue easier but maybe not...]
Last edited: