• Welcome to AppraisersForum.com, the premier online  community for the discussion of real estate appraisal. Register a free account to be able to post and unlock additional forums and features.

Appraisal vs. Evaluation. What are evaluations?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Gulf Coast

Sophomore Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2013
Professional Status
Appraiser Trainee
State
Florida
One of my clients is going to start ordering "evaluations" for loan renewals. What are they? I need to give them a price. Are they more work or less? Thanks!
 
What did your supervisor tell you about them?
 
An appraisal by any other name is still an appraisal!
 
First, I don't think this topic belongs in the "Newbie" section - this is a topic of much debate and misunderstanding among many appraisers.

Second, the easiest way I explain the difference is that "evaluation" is a banking term, and as a label, has no meaning in the appraisal field. As far as appraisers are concerned, if you put a number on a piece of real estate, you've completed an appraisal.

In banking, an "evaluation" has a very specific use, under very specific circumstances, as summarized in the Interagency Guidelines. Those circumstances have nothing to do with the appraiser, but have to do with the bank's internal lending policies.
 
One of my clients is going to start ordering "evaluations" for loan renewals. What are they? I need to give them a price. Are they more work or less? Thanks!

"Evaluation"?

If you offer an opinion of "value", if your work is subject to USPAP--then, yes, you can do an "evaluation", BUT, it will be an APPRAISAL. (Side-note: there may be a state of two that--foolishly in my opinion--did a carve-out to allow a licensee to do an evaluation not subject to USPAP.)

"Evaluation" by a licensed appraiser? Someone wants a licensed appraiser to do work on the cheap.
 
I recently saw an "evaluation" come into our office. This "evaluation" was flawed in basic appraisal methodology. I looked up the individual who wrote the report and discovered that she was not a licensed appraiser. So, I came to the conclusion that she was calling her work an evaluation not an appraisal since she in fact did not hold the actual title or credentials, appraiser.
 
The Appraisal Institute has a guidance note out on how appraisers can do "evaluations".

I've done one for a client.

However, while a client may call it an "evaluation", if a licensed appraiser is engaged to complete it, it is an appraisal (and must follow all the applicable standards).

In my case, it was a narrative. The significant difference (IMO) was that I (or the client) didn't have to worry about the so-called GSE guidelines.

It took as long as a typical 1004 (mine was a drive-by) and it cost the same as a 1004.
My client preferred it because they are getting sick of the so-called GSE guidelines as well.

Good luck!
 
An evaluation is a bank term for a report that is for property that is not Federally Related or FRT (Federally Related Transaction) and currently that de minimu is $250,000.

The minimum requirements of an evaluation are somewhat less than an appraisal, but this does an appraiser no good as we still must meet USPAP. I used to use a 1 page summary report form that Harrison created. It really didn't save any time, but was "different" from the 1004.

For the appraiser appraisal = evaluation = same fee...
 
Forgive the length. I haunt the forum alot, mainly trusting the vets here will eventually get to the core of an issue in a more quick-witted meme-orial way...

This is an issue with valuation pros limiting themselves to the label of 'appraiser', really meaning 'state licensed appraiser'. We are too used to relying on civil gov't to qualify, define, dictate, & protect our profession. The big picture is valuation, not appraisal; appraisal is a subset of valuation even per holy writ USPAP. If a person wants to stay in the subset, fine, be blessed. But there is a bigger market out there in addition to federally related transaction/USPAP/FDIC/FMNA/Comptroller/de minimus bank loan market.

When a market-derived demand appears, the only real question is whether I am in a position to satisfy it by offering expanded valuation services. I personally like to get ahead by serving others, not appealing to the king or bemoaning change in tastes.

Where the State gives recognition (favors), the State also controls. But, in those instances where no civil gov't regulations require an appraisal (subset of valuation)...If you are not marketing yourself only as a 'licensed appraiser', &/or the prospective client is not engaging you with expectation you will perform one, no appraisal-centric constraints apply. Neither should they.

Yes, we can perform a valuation without performing an appraisal. An appraisal is always a valuation, though. Valuation is a bigger 'circle'. There seems to be confusion on this issue.

Go, frolic in the new grass, just make sure you & the client are on the same page about what your role is in providing the non-appraisal valuation service. Get comfy wearing multiple hats for the sake of your clients. With correct communication and well-written agreements/reports, they need not be confused about what head dress you have on each specific time. Again, it is for the sake of the client that I expand my services outside the circle of appraisal only.

If I exclusively market myself as an appraiser, so that a prospective client hires me based on that assumption, yes I will be bound in the smaller circle (or the client requested, but that's their choice not mine). That is not because appraisal trumps all, though. It's because I've chosen to restrain myself in what products are supplied.

If, in fact, what I ALWAYS am is an appraiser then, to me (not USPAP tho), every 'eval' is in fact an appraisal 'subject to...' That is not because USPAP said every valuation is automatically an appraisal, not because appraisers always do it better because they are appraisers by god, not because that evaluator did it worse then me because they're not an appraiser by god, not because they didn't show a grid with three comps or some advanced mathematical gymnastics or whatever, no. It is because I CHOSE that I would only perform appraisals (a subset of valuation). The result many times is I either price myself out of an assignment on one side or get paid a lower $ per unit of time on the other.

As an 'appraiser only', I WILL always 'comply'. And I will take more time due to scope creep/AMC stips/regulatory satisfaction & have to charge more even though the client may not need that level of 'service'. You wanna know how to sock it to AMCs? Take part of their business by doing 'evals' (below de minimus valuations, stocking stuffer annual reviews, etc). For clients who only need something 'quick & dirty', a number, something on a few pages based on my experience & built trust, something where every word has meaning not 75% legal-ese/bureaucrat-ese/compliance-ese that doesn't really cover my backside anymore anyway, they should have it.

Clients are prospective buyers of our services, and yes they have a say in a (somewhat) open market of what level of product 'quality' is desired, the civil gov't or myopic protests of 'state certified appraiser only' aside.

As a 15+ year Realtor, sales agent, & 'state certified appraiser', it is my conclusion appraisers are the best valuation experts. They generally have greater applied knowledge, experience, & ethics - whether imposed from the outside or, hopefully, inculcated from the inside over time. We've been in the game & passed through the fire. That is exactly WHY we should seek to expand our services outside the little circle & position ourselves in the all-encompassing big circle of real estate valuation.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Find a Real Estate Appraiser - Enter Zip Code

Copyright © 2000-, AppraisersForum.com, All Rights Reserved
AppraisersForum.com is proudly hosted by the folks at
AppraiserSites.com
Back
Top