So we know that a college degree is not necessary to become licensed. The TAF/AQB in their infinite wisdom will pair that down. Now I think this is just one part of the puzzle leading to Licensing. So I might of already covered this next part if so it's worth repeating. There is significant evidence that are trainee/trainer may not be the best way to train trainee's or it lacks some refinement.
Aptitude tests may provide some insights into whether a certified residential appraiser has qualities that could make them a good teacher, but they won't give a full or definitive answer. Teaching is a multifaceted skill, and while tests might assess certain relevant traits, they can't fully capture someone's ability to mentor effectively.
For example, an aptitude test might evaluate:
- **Communication skills:** The ability to convey ideas clearly.
- **Interpersonal skills:** Empathy, patience, and the ability to connect with others.
- **Problem-solving:** An important skill for guiding trainees through challenges.
- **Leadership potential:** Skills for inspiring and motivating others.
However, the act of teaching also involves passion, experience, adaptability, and a genuine willingness to help others succeed—qualities that an aptitude test may not always measure. Observing an appraiser in action as a mentor, or seeking feedback from previous trainees, would be more effective in assessing their teaching capability. I think the Quality control on this teaching aspect shows up late in the game when the trainee sits for the state licensing exam.
So over all my opinion is our system does work. Could it be improved? Sure most anything can be improved.