J Grant
Elite Member
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2003
- Professional Status
- Certified Residential Appraiser
- State
- Florida
DEFINITION OF MARKET VALUE: The most probable price which a property should bring in a competitive and open market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, the buyer and seller, each acting prudently, knowledgeably and assuming the price is not affected by undue stimulus. Implicit in this definition is the consummation of a sale as of a specified date and the passing of title from seller to buyer under conditions whereby
Focusing on two aspects: most probable price a property should bring. Should means per the per the appraisal development itself, linked to the MV definition. The verbiage is not a speculative most probable price a property would bring (on) effective date. (would if Y happens)
The verbiage as of is used instead of "on"; because of the below;
Implicit in the definition is consummation of sale and passing of title AS OF X effective date. Since sale prices of contracts are typically negotiated before a property closes and passes title, doesn't this verbiage imply the price of subject was set prior to effective date? It even states "implicit in this definition" . A time adjustment can bring retrospective activity such as the sold comp prices current to today's effective date, but a time adjustment can't take us beyond the effective date to a future value (unless deriving a future value is the purpose of assignment)
I post this because agents ( and some appraisers) feel that appraisal results of market value opinions are "behind" the market. (behind future direction of the market) If that is so it is by design per the MV definition itself. I presume this is intentional since a value opinion is by design somewhat different than a pure price opinion. A price opinion can be more speculative in the future, or based only on today, vs a value opinion which is reliant on past events to support it.
Focusing on two aspects: most probable price a property should bring. Should means per the per the appraisal development itself, linked to the MV definition. The verbiage is not a speculative most probable price a property would bring (on) effective date. (would if Y happens)
The verbiage as of is used instead of "on"; because of the below;
Implicit in the definition is consummation of sale and passing of title AS OF X effective date. Since sale prices of contracts are typically negotiated before a property closes and passes title, doesn't this verbiage imply the price of subject was set prior to effective date? It even states "implicit in this definition" . A time adjustment can bring retrospective activity such as the sold comp prices current to today's effective date, but a time adjustment can't take us beyond the effective date to a future value (unless deriving a future value is the purpose of assignment)
I post this because agents ( and some appraisers) feel that appraisal results of market value opinions are "behind" the market. (behind future direction of the market) If that is so it is by design per the MV definition itself. I presume this is intentional since a value opinion is by design somewhat different than a pure price opinion. A price opinion can be more speculative in the future, or based only on today, vs a value opinion which is reliant on past events to support it.
Last edited: