Pete, I love your summary statements at the end of your posts, spoken without any foundation, data or knowledge of the area you speak of. You sound like you're quoting from an article you read on FNMA's or some management company's site. Why would they tell us anything that would hurt their interest and help ours? Right?
And congratulations on your tenure. I've done the same stretch. I'm better looking too. Has nothing to do with it though...right? I'll show you 10 appraisal company owners who made over 1 million in 5 years who barely made it out of high school. But when I said you were an employee, I meant figuratively. You know, the employee mentality? The crowds at my shows would have gotten that.
Maybe you can give me an example of one of these subtle nuances in the single family residential market, that is prevalent, that you will have not quantified with the UAD. Remember, prevalent.
Because if you think that every appraisal done for single family mortgage requires the personal touch of an appraiser, you're vain. Otherwise, there would be no such thing as an AVM.
Are you're telling me that your opinion has never aligned with an AVM, ever? I'm not saying that you're not a talented, knowledgeable appraiser and that said knowledge is not valuable. I'm simply saying that the market share you lay claim to now will narrow as computers gain access to important data they never had in the past. Data that you seem to have no problem giving to them.
And yes, I have diversified my entrepreneurial portfolio in case my expertise becomes less needed in the marketplace. That's what business owners do, they adapt.
Employees with no ability to do so go into denial and say...that will never happen though.
My whole point from the beginning was that the UAD quantifies huge amounts of relevant data in a way that is unprecedented. Furthermore, it encodes it. So just don't sign an agreement with a company, having a vested interest in the development of a super AVM, that relinquishes your intellectual rights to the content. I can't believe you're arguing against that. Can anyone else? I'm sorry for calling you a mole. You're obviously an appraisal instructor. You have to have some sort of interest in playing down potential threats with rhetoric you've read in magazines and online articles. Magazines, most likely, owned by companies that have an interest in appraisers being complicit in this paradigm shift.