• Welcome to AppraisersForum.com, the premier online  community for the discussion of real estate appraisal. Register a free account to be able to post and unlock additional forums and features.

Avoiding Revisions Requests

sputnam

Elite Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2012
Professional Status
Certified General Appraiser
State
North Carolina
Let's face it. If an appraiser is doing the job, and has been at it for any length of time, they are going to get revision requests. Some of them are nearly unavoidable. However, there are a few simple things an appraiser can do to reduce how many are received.

1- Read the Letter of Engagement. Every word. Use it as a check list. There is no single standard, beyond what's required by USPAP, for the contents of an appraisal report or for Client requirements. Most of the time, I get a copy of the LOE for the appraisals I review. Nearly every day, I have to request revisions because the appraiser did not include something that was requested in the LOE.

2- Spend an hour (probably less) reviewing and updating your report template. If you are seasoned appraiser... or a new one using a pased down template... read it... every word. It's likely that you are transmitting reports with incorrect citations and/or canned comments that are either untrue or not relevant to the current appraisal. It's likely to get you a revision request... and in the worst cases, it could produce a USPAP violation.

3- Come on... really? You can't spare a couple of minutes to run spell check before you deliver the appraisal report? Most of the time an incorrectly spelled word makes no difference. Occasionally, it can impact the credibilty of the appraisal report. As appraisers we may think that the insistence on spelling a borrower's name or the name of the Client correctly is nit picky... but the Client doesn't think so... and it will get you at revision request.

Of course, there are others... and there will never be anyway to prevent ROVs... if you are actually appraising and not simply confirming the sales price or hoped for value. The old saying is true, "If you don't have the time to do it right, where will you find time to do it over?"
 
I don't like all caps... but, it doesn't warrant a revision reequest.
 
Caps on the original green URAR paper only form was easier to read and follow. It stood out, you didn't have to read the green print to understand your comment.
 
One of the bad things about working for myself is I don’t have a “second set of eyes” on my report before I send it out. Yes, I review my report before I send it out but I wrote it. I have “conformational bias”. Human nature sucks! I am going to miss something twice!

I will point out one thing. Since we all now use ANSI in measuring and assessors don’t, there is almost never a time where our GLA doesn’t completely match the field card. Lenders now have access to the field card. I generally make a comment if what I measure is “out of whack” with the PRC.

Problem arises when my definition “of whack” differs with the underwriter’s definition. I did one last week where the difference was less than 80 square feet on a 2 story dwelling. I didn’t bother mention it. Underwriter came back with, “GLA as measured was larger than actually is.”. That assumes I was wrong!

After complaining to my wife, to get it out of my system, I responded with, “I measured according to ANSI. Assessor was wrong due to rounding to nearest foot.”
 
Find a Real Estate Appraiser - Enter Zip Code

Copyright © 2000-, AppraisersForum.com, All Rights Reserved
AppraisersForum.com is proudly hosted by the folks at
AppraiserSites.com
Back
Top