Terrel-"Auction Theory is "In equilibrium, the auction ends when the bidder with the second-highest value drops out, so the winner pays an amount equal to the second highest value"
It there's an auction, multiple offers from 5 buyers, and one "wins" at the highest bid of 300k, that means the 4 others DID NOT think the property was worth 300k(. So 4 out of 5 buyers did not think it worth 300k. Is the highest price really the market speaking, or just the risky edge of the market? Maybe the market value opinion of the appraisal will turn out to be 300k, maybe less, maybe more. But an appraiser is not supposed to say "yes" to the price just because a buyer is willing to "pay" it. (as the 2 posters above noted)
The borrower is not actually willing or able to PAY the price, they are willing to BORROW the price Now the client asks appraiser; named buyer is willing to borrow money to buy a house they want for 300k But is the property's market value 300k, or is it something else, so we can make an informed lending decision?