• Welcome to AppraisersForum.com, the premier online  community for the discussion of real estate appraisal. Register a free account to be able to post and unlock additional forums and features.

Biden tax plan...

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think that is good for first time homebuyers in low income and poverty stricken areas. I have no problem with it. As long as debt to income ratios are good, I have no problem with it. The bank or somebody will likely get most of the $15,000.
 
Town Hall meetings- What a joke every person had scripted easy questions. A complete charade. Reminds me of the time was engaged in a local Senators campaign to sit in a mock town hall meeting. The guy was a previous mortgage broker and like everyone was doing a lot of stated income and sub-prime loans prior to the 2008 mortgage meltdown. The guy he was running against, was a goverment employee and he was running adds calling my guy "Subprime Mike" and a lot of other local attack adds. So my role was to develop questions to ask the State Senator that would get him angry or off track. The first five panel members asked him typical softball questions, like school issues, local taxes, new programs for seniors etc. When my time arrived I walked up to the micro-phone, and asked him how he could sleep at night after making, hundreds maybe thousands of high risk sub-Prime and stated income loans and then, seconded it with , how many did your company foreclose on ? The Senators face turned red and he went into a raging fit. The moderator had to remind him that this was a mock town hall to see how he would handle a person like me. Anyway-let me just ask just 2 hardball questions to Basement Joe and I would have him stammering, stuttering, and heading into a third stroke.
 
Last edited:
The bank is probably going to need that $15,000 pretty soon. Better hold off on stimulus. TBTF will happen again. Could cut their taxes to zero maybe. LOL
 
Last edited:
If you cut taxes on top 1% to zero, you will have no job. Many of top 1% are already trying to do private/public partnerships. I don't understand why they can't. They already exist in low to moderate income areas with subsidies like the $15,000, but you have some heavy hitters in top 1% that don't mind paying more taxes, but would rather do partnerships.
 
Last edited:
Who is going to pay for this?

He is pandering for votes.

It is pathetic.
Who pays when corporations get million $ tax breaks ?

A 15k tax break to a working person vs a millions of tax breaks to a corporation or wealthy individual...

WE pay either way. I'd rather help a working person out
 
Who pays when corporations get million $ tax breaks ?

A 15k tax break to a working person vs a millions of tax breaks to a corporation or wealthy individual...

WE pay either way. I'd rather help a working person out
Why?
Will that working person add more back to the economy than the rich corporation? Or is it always about feelings?
 
As I have probably said before on this forum, Corporations do not pay taxes they collect them. If taxes go up so will prices or in the alternative expenses will be cut and eventually lead to job loss. When Corporations are given tax breaks I will concede that some of the savings may go to investors and high level executives, but some is also used to expand the business, add plant and equipment and hire additional employees. Not sure how a Presidential candidate can say they are going to tax the heck out of corporations and in the next breath say they are going to create a multi-million number of jobs. The math does not work. I understand that small businesses account for a number of the jobs, but in most instance small businesses are unable to provide a great wage and benefit package.

If it were me the first tax issue I would tackle is Social Security and Medicare, both of which are the most regressive taxes out there. One could argue sales taxes is also, but that is strictly based on consumption so while it hits lower income folks the hardest (percentage of income wise) at least everyone has to pay it.. Currently earnings above $132,900 are not subject to Social Security or Medicare taxation. I would uncap it so that all earned income regardless of the amount would be subject to both taxes, continuing the same rates and also requiring the employer's match. Imagine if some of the music stars, movie stars, sports stars, major corporate executives, etc. and there millions upon millions of dollars of earned income were to pay in a combined 15.3%. It might not correct the projected shortfall in the system at least it would extend the day of reckoning out some.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DTB
That's too complex for people, that's why the politicians just pander with tax cut talk tailored for the little guy to suck up like soup.

That's right Mabel stick it to the rich. :rof:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Find a Real Estate Appraiser - Enter Zip Code

Copyright © 2000-, AppraisersForum.com, All Rights Reserved
AppraisersForum.com is proudly hosted by the folks at
AppraiserSites.com
Back
Top