• Welcome to AppraisersForum.com, the premier online  community for the discussion of real estate appraisal. Register a free account to be able to post and unlock additional forums and features.

Can 2 contiguous parcels deeded together with the same owner be sold separately?

The OP has stated that the 2 "parcels" in question are actually 2 independent properties each with their own PID each improved with a duplex but on the same deed. Not sure how it is in the OP's area. But around here that means I have 2 individual properties. If it was one property consisting of 2 lots one would assume it would only have 1 PID
 
The OP has stated that the 2 "parcels" in question are actually 2 independent properties each with their own PID each improved with a duplex but on the same deed. Not sure how it is in the OP's area. But around here that means I have 2 individual properties. If it was one property consisting of 2 lots one would assume it would only have 1 PID
That's fine if you do a HC where they have to be sold together based on everything else involved. We don't even know based on local zoning if anything is way outside their regulations.
 
Don't play stupid with me.
 
So you actually have 2 completely legally separate duplexes that just happen to be on one deed. What is the confusion. You can have more than one individual property on a deed. Doesn't change what each property is or combine them as one.
Yes that's the basic question I was asking. I need to learn more about deeds.
 
Most likely setbacks would not be a problem as the poster has stated there is a parking lot between the two buildings. Additionally, probably the only area that would be affected by setbacks in the event of a split, would be the area between the two parcels that is currently under common ownership. In that case the owner could agree to any infringement on the required setback and it should be a non-issue. At least that is the way it operates in most areas, but who know what kind of regulations are in California.
The two buildings are set back at an equal distance, and with a significant distance, from the front public road, so both lots would appear to be affected identically. [ Coincidentally, it's "rumored" that the city plans to widen the street that would involve taking a portion of the front of the two lots, but beyond the As Is valuation on the Effective Date... ]
 
If you were to use a narrative report, this assignment could be handled as one report. First you would describe the property in its entirety as it presently exists and provide a value. Then you could break out each parcel and provide separate values. By doing it this way you end up only presenting the basics regarding zoning, HBU, neighborhood/marketing area, flood, environmental, assessment, pictures, expansion potential, etc. information one time rather than two or three.

Doing it like this would also provide your client with an idea of what the whole parcel is worth and what each of the individual parcels are worth, which may impact their decision process. Unless the two parcels and the related improvements are absolute model matches, it is very possible that each parcel will have a different stand-alone value.

When developing your HBU would it be possible to construct additional units on either of the parcels if separated and/or on the parcel as a whole. Could a third duplex or larger building be built along the end of the parking area, creating a "U" shaped situation?
Just FYI my client is the rental property manager who is considering to purchase the properties, which she thought was one property with two buildings, although my research revealed that it is comprised of two contiguous properties, apparently identical physical improements, each with apparently identical lot orientations on the two parcels. The improvements were built when the property was unincorporated County land before being included in the City when it became incorporated. No original records appear to be available. So an assumption must be made that it is "legal non-conforming" rather than "illegal." Possible an EA although typical to the extent that a regular assumption can be applied iMO.
 
So an assumption must be made that it is "legal non-conforming" rather than "illegal." Possible an EA although typical to the extent that a regular assumption can be applied iMO.
What does current zoning say?
 
What does current zoning say?
Waiting on City Planning because the interactive City zoning map includes two similar shades of blue, either Communcial Manufacturing or Administrative Professional, neiher of which allows any residential improvements...
 
Find a Real Estate Appraiser - Enter Zip Code

Copyright © 2000-, AppraisersForum.com, All Rights Reserved
AppraisersForum.com is proudly hosted by the folks at
AppraiserSites.com
Back
Top