- Joined
- Apr 14, 2007
- Professional Status
- Certified Residential Appraiser
- State
- Tennessee
I spent a week in Sevier County, Tennessee and once again ended up in the middle of a discussion about the Sneetches in this business with stars on their bellies versus those who don’t. (Kudos to Dr Seuss). There are CGs in Tennessee who jump up on a stump and preach that a CR must never do an appraisal of an AirBNB because of the complexity or commercial aspect that requires the advanced brain of a CG. The HBU of all residential properties in Sevier County (Pigeon Forge, Gatlinburg, etc) is likely AirBNB everywhere because the market is driven by tourism due to Dollywood and Gatlinburg proper, with all the resort amenities.
There’s 3-4 CGs in that county and 25-30 CRs. I know of CRs up there that dance circles around many CGs in ability and intelligence, and doing an appraisal of an AirBNB is no big deal for them because they know that industry inside and out. If they are able to complete standard income producing rentals, then why pick out the short terms as being outside their wheelhouse? He pointed to education and the law. He had 4 years of experience in the area, and one CR up there dwarfs him by decades of experience.
I’ve said this a hundred times. Since a big swath of CGs were brought in prior to degrees and proof of competency beyond the CRs, why do we have this star on the belly requirement? Shouldn’t competency always rule the day? I always thought appraisers should have one license, just like an attorney, with their competency and expertise being the driver of what they are able to appraise.
My argument was a funny one with that CG who debated me about this. He asked if I felt competent to do them, and I told him I wasn’t in an area like Sevierville and we don’t see that many in my coverage area. But I asked him if he was competent to do a barndo on 40 acres near the Tennessee River with a barn and a guest house, and he had never heard of such a thing of course. Competence and complexity changes from area to area.
I know there are CGs out here that will get bent out of shape in having this discussion, but the whole licensing process ought to be different in my view. Let competency rule, as it was intended in the first place. One license - various specialties.
There’s 3-4 CGs in that county and 25-30 CRs. I know of CRs up there that dance circles around many CGs in ability and intelligence, and doing an appraisal of an AirBNB is no big deal for them because they know that industry inside and out. If they are able to complete standard income producing rentals, then why pick out the short terms as being outside their wheelhouse? He pointed to education and the law. He had 4 years of experience in the area, and one CR up there dwarfs him by decades of experience.
I’ve said this a hundred times. Since a big swath of CGs were brought in prior to degrees and proof of competency beyond the CRs, why do we have this star on the belly requirement? Shouldn’t competency always rule the day? I always thought appraisers should have one license, just like an attorney, with their competency and expertise being the driver of what they are able to appraise.
My argument was a funny one with that CG who debated me about this. He asked if I felt competent to do them, and I told him I wasn’t in an area like Sevierville and we don’t see that many in my coverage area. But I asked him if he was competent to do a barndo on 40 acres near the Tennessee River with a barn and a guest house, and he had never heard of such a thing of course. Competence and complexity changes from area to area.
I know there are CGs out here that will get bent out of shape in having this discussion, but the whole licensing process ought to be different in my view. Let competency rule, as it was intended in the first place. One license - various specialties.