• Welcome to AppraisersForum.com, the premier online  community for the discussion of real estate appraisal. Register a free account to be able to post and unlock additional forums and features.

Cfpb Is Now The Bcfp

Status
Not open for further replies.

Meandering

Elite Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2006
Professional Status
Real Estate Agent or Broker
State
Pennsylvania
Next week brings a new House subcommittee hearing on the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (BCFP, formerly referred to as CFPB) plus a handful of comment deadlines and events focusing on financial services industry issues and regulation.

June 4: Comments are due to the BCFP on its RFI on bureau public reporting of consumer complaint information. This RFI, issued March 1, seeks public input about potential changes to BCFP’s public reporting practices of consumer complaint information, and to consider whether any changes to the practices would be appropriate. As of Thursday, 22,820 comments had been received, according to Regulations.gov. Go here to read more and submit comments.

June 6: The House Financial Services Subcommittee on Financial Institutions and Consumer Credit holds a hearing titled “Improving Transparency and Accountability at the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection.” The hearing is scheduled to begin at 2 p.m. ET. No witness list had been published as of press time (check back for updates).

June 7: Comments are due on the BCFP’s bureau rulemaking processes RFI. Issued March 7, this RFI seeks information to assist the bureau in assessing the overall efficiency and effectiveness of its rulemaking processes and, consistent with law, considering whether any changes to its rulemaking processes would be appropriate. As of Thurs


https://www.regreport.info/2018/06/...-under-scrutiny-june-6-in-house-hearing-more/

Just thought you might want to know the name of the bureau has been changed, and this little tid bit,



UPDATED: Appraisal management company registry plan sent to OMB, out for comment one more time


OMB is
the Office of Management and Budget.

As you may (or may not) know, the ASC is required to maintain a national registry of AMCs that are subject to state "supervision" if the state has elected to register AMCs. The states are required to collect information on AMCs, which is very minimal information like, the AMC's name, address, registration or license number, number of appraisers and disciplinary actions, however, now the government can't decide if they really need any information, or just the money, so......

Comments continue to be invited on:


(a) Whether the collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility;


(b) The accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the collection of information;


(c) Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected;


(d) Ways to minimize the burden of the collection on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology; and


(e) Estimates of capital or start-up costs and costs of operation, maintenance, and purchase of services to provide information.


The subcommittee estimates each entry to the ASC will take the submitter about 15 minutes. The overall burden estimate assumes all 50 states will participate and an average of 150 AMCs in each state.


FFIEC Appraisal Subcommittee information collection: Reporting information for the AMC Registry

If you have an idea or an opinion that can help them out, please do respond to their request for comment.

.
 
Next week brings a new House subcommittee hearing on the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (BCFP, formerly referred to as CFPB) plus a handful of comment deadlines and events focusing on financial services industry issues and regulation.

June 4: Comments are due to the BCFP on its RFI on bureau public reporting of consumer complaint information. This RFI, issued March 1, seeks public input about potential changes to BCFP’s public reporting practices of consumer complaint information, and to consider whether any changes to the practices would be appropriate. As of Thursday, 22,820 comments had been received, according to Regulations.gov. Go here to read more and submit comments.

June 6: The House Financial Services Subcommittee on Financial Institutions and Consumer Credit holds a hearing titled “Improving Transparency and Accountability at the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection.” The hearing is scheduled to begin at 2 p.m. ET. No witness list had been published as of press time (check back for updates).

June 7: Comments are due on the BCFP’s bureau rulemaking processes RFI. Issued March 7, this RFI seeks information to assist the bureau in assessing the overall efficiency and effectiveness of its rulemaking processes and, consistent with law, considering whether any changes to its rulemaking processes would be appropriate. As of Thurs


https://www.regreport.info/2018/06/...-under-scrutiny-june-6-in-house-hearing-more/

Just thought you might want to know the name of the bureau has been changed, and this little tid bit,



UPDATED: Appraisal management company registry plan sent to OMB, out for comment one more time


OMB is
the Office of Management and Budget.

As you may (or may not) know, the ASC is required to maintain a national registry of AMCs that are subject to state "supervision" if the state has elected to register AMCs. The states are required to collect information on AMCs, which is very minimal information like, the AMC's name, address, registration or license number, number of appraisers and disciplinary actions, however, now the government can't decide if they really need any information, or just the money, so......

Comments continue to be invited on:


(a) Whether the collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility;


(b) The accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the collection of information;


(c) Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected;


(d) Ways to minimize the burden of the collection on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology; and


(e) Estimates of capital or start-up costs and costs of operation, maintenance, and purchase of services to provide information.


The subcommittee estimates each entry to the ASC will take the submitter about 15 minutes. The overall burden estimate assumes all 50 states will participate and an average of 150 AMCs in each state.


FFIEC Appraisal Subcommittee information collection: Reporting information for the AMC Registry

If you have an idea or an opinion that can help them out, please do respond to their request for comment.

.
50 states x avg of x150 AMCs per state is 7,500 AMCs. Wow. Where are they getting their numbers from??
 
Bye-Bye- CFPB - Nobody going to miss you or Frank & Dodd
 
Dodd-Frank and the CFPB are now DEAD! S.2155 ( The Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act ) that was signed into law on May 25th, 2018 is a direct replacement for Dodd-Frank. Lenders will now have significantly more flexibility on how they manage the appraisal ordering process. AMC's will start to loose market share and most will slowly fade away. Soon appraisers will regain control of their own businesses and be able to build a clientele that actually cares about us. We will no longer be just a number in the algorithm!
 
Dodd-Frank and the CFPB are now DEAD! S.2155 ( The Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act ) that was signed into law on May 25th, 2018 is a direct replacement for Dodd-Frank. Lenders will now have significantly more flexibility on how they manage the appraisal ordering process. AMC's will start to loose market share and most will slowly fade away. Soon appraisers will regain control of their own businesses and be able to build a clientele that actually cares about us. We will no longer be just a number in the algorithm!
Well it's a limited gutting of Frank-Dodd but the beginning and hopefully we can all get back to business like in the good old days !
 
Banks being given carte blanche--if it makes you money and may screw someone all the way, so what! Go for it.
 
the ASC is required to maintain a national registry of AMCs that are subject to state "supervision" if the state has elected to register AMCs.
 
What good old days?

you-the-man-men-s-premium-t-shirt.jpg
 
Dodd-Frank and the CFPB are now DEAD! S.2155 ( The Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act ) that was signed into law on May 25th, 2018 is a direct replacement for Dodd-Frank. Lenders will now have significantly more flexibility on how they manage the appraisal ordering process. AMC's will start to loose market share and most will slowly fade away. Soon appraisers will regain control of their own businesses and be able to build a clientele that actually cares about us. We will no longer be just a number in the algorithm!

can you post a link to this? i have not seen a single thing referencing a change in the appraisal ordering process, or anything at all to do with appraisals, in any of the several articles i have read about the first step in the repeal of DF. lenders are under no obligation to use AMCs and never have been, so what exactly has changed? are you saying that LOs are once again able to have their go-to appraisers and send them all the deals they need to close? where did you read this?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Find a Real Estate Appraiser - Enter Zip Code

Copyright © 2000-, AppraisersForum.com, All Rights Reserved
AppraisersForum.com is proudly hosted by the folks at
AppraiserSites.com
Back
Top