8)
Hate to throw cold water on some of you're wording but............the client is not always the "client" named in the report. Example:
On a VA Appraisal the VA is the client, the client named in the report as well as others who are authorized to receive, make VA loans, or engage in VA underwriting may become an intended user. I am doing a final inspection on a property tommorow for a "client" that is not named in the report but has had the report transferred to them(no name change on the report), and will close the loan with my final report(inspection), report still in another "clients" name. This is the way VA has authorized VA loans to operate, and VA is the client. Yes, I will disclose this in my final report that will become an integral part of the report.
Also, FHA is the client in an FHA appraisal and the "client" named in the report is an intended user. Works a lot like the VA example with some difference.
With the change next year in the 2003 USPAP, the "appraisal" will become the intelectual property of the appraiser. The "Client" will own the report, done for them based on the appraisal. Along comes another lender and wants a recertification of value or update(terms will be meaningless in 2003 USPAP), you tell them "what you really are asking for is a new assignments", I can do that based on the appraisal that I own of that property, and my fee will be........$zzz.XX
My suggestion is to clearly identify by name or type the intended user, and the intended use. However, with the changes referred to, almost any entity can become an "intended user".
Suggestion........get a copy of the 2003 USPAP as soon as possible, and in the mean time get a copy of the approved(adopted) changes to the idea of an update of an appraisal.
Don Clark, IFA
Overheard in my local barbershop.........."It's good to have money, whether you are rich or poor".