• Welcome to AppraisersForum.com, the premier online  community for the discussion of real estate appraisal. Register a free account to be able to post and unlock additional forums and features.

Client wants more information

Status
Not open for further replies.
The time since one or more of the "comparables" closed is more than six months. Appraiser writes

"A lack of recent sales necessitated the appraiser to use sales older than six moths"

That is a statement, not a summary of an explanation.

Why is there a lack of recent comparable sales. Are there no sellers? Everyone loves this area so much that few ever leave. That is a good thing. If there are no buyers and sellers abound that is a bad thing. Without the second statement, which is related, the first is just a statement. By providing the second part it moves toward a summation of the market.

Perhaps the marketing time, declining and oversupply on page 1 fills in the blank or perhaps the top of page 2 with the sold comps compared to available listings? :shrug:
 
Note: market comments are a bit out of date. This report is from last September.

Neighborhood characteristics, boundaries and factors that affect marketability:

Subject is located about 2 miles easterly of the central business district of Hopland There are no distinct neighborhood boundaries for this rural area but in general the neighborhood can be described as being along Pratt Ranch Road, north of State Highway 175 for a distance of about 2 miles. Past that point most of the area is tribal lands. The area between the Sonoma/Mendocino County line, along Highway 101 north to Ukiah is similar to the subject's location consisting of sparsely developed rangelands and most buyers seeking residential property similar to the subject would consider the general area.

Hopland, with a population of approximately 900 residents, is a rural or semi-rural ranching and farming community approximately 12 miles north of the Sonoma County line and 15 miles south of Ukiah, the largest city in Mendocino County and seat of local government. Bucolic in nature, the Hopland area has many vineyards, orchards, farms and ranches and a thriving wine and tourist industry. Very limited employment in Hopland with the exception of local service industry, seasonal, agricultural employment and the large Indian Casino east of town and very near the subject. Most residents commute to employment centers in Ukiah or to major employers in Sonoma and Marin Counties, 1 - 2 hours southerly via Highway 101. Other residents are retired, self employed, telecommute or have 2nd homes here. Property values have continued to rise in the past 2-3 years but is more or less stable at this time, although there are too few sales in any given year to demonstrate a reliable trend. Much of the appeal of Hopland is the rural, country setting while still reasonably proximate to major metropolitan employment centers, services and infrastructure. Exposure time averages less than 120 days when appropriate marketing techniques are employed by a brokerage or realty company which specializes in the marketing of this property type. Some properties require signficant lengths of time to market due to initial overpricing. Market or sales activity remains slow compared with the previous periods and is likely a result of very public awareness in the ongoing deterioration of real estate markets on a national level and particularly in California at this time. Buyer and seller uncertainty at this time, more stringent loan qualification requirements, fewer loan program available. Median single family sales pricing for rural residential acreage property in Mendocino County is essentially unchanged from 12 months ago and the market is considered stable despite severe adverse market conditions throughout the region and most of the nation. Demand for small to intermediate acreage properties appears to remain good and there is a limited inventory. Hopland is a very small, rural community with only a few sales each year and a very wide diversity of property types ranging from small lots with very modest structures to large tracts of land with large custom homes. The data is insufficient to report a reliable market trend analysis but based on what data is available and my personal observations as a long time resident of Hopland it is my opinion that pricing is stable at this time.

Zoning Compliance:
RL160 - Rangeland District - 160 acre minimum lot size. Maximum dwelling density is one dwelling per 160 acres. As the lot is smaller than the 160 acre minimum and was created prior to the implementation of the RL160 zoning district it is considered legal, non-conforming. This district is intended to create and preserve areas for, (A) the grazing of livestock, (B) the production and harvest of natural resources, and (C) the protection of such natural resources as watershed lands from fire, pollution, erosion, and other detrimental effects. Processing of products produced on the premises would be permitted as would certain commercial activities associated with crop and animal raising. Typically the R-L District would be applied to lands for incorporation into Type II Agricultural Preserves, other lands generally in range use, and intermixed smaller parcels and other contiguous lands, the inclusion of which is necessary for the protection and efficient management of rangelands. (Ord. No. 3639 (part), adopted 1987) A single family residence is among the permitted uses. Accessory structures and an accessory dwelling unit are also permitted uses.

Zoning compliance is legal, non-conforming and has been grandfathered. Improvements, as proposed, are a legal, permitted and conforming use. The parcel cannot be further subdivided into smaller lots. The current improvements are reasonably typical for the area and represent highest and best use.

Clients often ask the appraiser to provide an opinion as to whether or not any improvments can be rebuilt when zoning compliance is listed as legal, non-conforming. Please note that only the Mendocino County Planning and Building Department can make a definitive statement as they are the controlling authority. The subject's improvements are a conforming use, the parcel size is smaller than the minimum lot size under the the applicable zoning district. It has been grandfathered and is considered a legal lot. The information below is from the County's planning and building department website. The appraiser believes the improvements can be rebuilt if destroyed but makes no guarantees or warranties whatsoever. If client needs a rebuild letter, the property owner can request this service from the Ukiah office of the Mendocino County Planning and Building Department. There is typically a fee for such a letter.

Division I of Title 20--Inland Zoning Code (Mendocino County)
Sec. 20.204.015 Restoration of Damaged Structures.


(A) Whenever a structure, the use of which does not conform with the regulations for the zone in which it is located or a structure which does not comply with the standards of yard spaces, height of structures, distances between structures, parking, etc., prescribed in the regulations for the zone in which the structure is located shall be destroyed by fire or other calamity or by act of God or by the public enemy, the structure may be restored and the nonconforming use may be resumed provided restoration is started within one (1) year and diligently pursued to completion.

(B) Whenever a structure, the use of which does not conform with the regulations for the zone in which it is located, or a structure which does not comply with the standards of yard spaces, height of structures, distance between structures, parking, etc., prescribed in the regulations for the zone in which it is located shall be voluntarily razed, the structure shall not be restored except in full conformity with the regulations of the zone in which it is located, and the nonconforming use shall not be resumed. (Ord. No. 3639 (part), adopted 1987)
 
Page 2 of 3

Legal Description:
That certain real property situated in the unincorporated area, County of Mendocino, State of California, described as follows: Parcel x, as shown and delineated on that "Record of Survey, Hopland Rancheria", recorded May 26, 1964 in Map Case 2, Drawer 3 at Page 14, upon that certain map entitled "Revised Record of Survey, Hopland Rancheria" filed for record February 24, 1965 in Map Case 2, Drawer 4, at Page 3, Mendocino County Record. APN 000-000-00-00

Description of site and improvements:
10+ acre tract located along a country lane in the foothills above the small community of Hopland. A smaller portion of the land which fronts Pratt Ranch Road is reasonably level, probably about two acres. The lot slopes steeply away from the road to a lower pasture type area of perhaps 4 or 5 acres total. The residence is located at the northerly portion of the upper lot near the boundary line. A large metal shop building is located near the southerly portion of the upper lot. The site is served with public electrical power, a drilled well for potable water and an onsite sewage systems (septic tank). Much of the lot is wooded with native species of oak and other trees with some dense underbrush. The lower area appears to have been cleared. The property is not well suited for agricultural or other non-residential uses due to terrain and topography but is appealing as a residential homesite for the same reasons. Views from the residence are mostly wooded and could be improved with tree trimming.

The residential improvements consist of a relatively large, custom home of good to very good quality construction, features and appointments. Construction was very recently completed of a major rehabilitation of the residence. The supervising appraiser completed an assignment on the subject property based on plans and specifications. Prior to this rehab the residence was of mixed construction with the central portion of the structure being a manufactured home. There were two site built additions attached to either end. One end had an attached garage with a bedroom suite above and the other end had a living room or family room. Plans and specifications called for the demolition and removal of the manufactured portion of the residence and building a new structure between the remaining site built additions. This has been completed and the final result exceeds what was originally specified in terms of quality and appointments.

Subject is high quailty with features such as imported blue stone tile and hand trowled solid wood flooring in the main living area and kitchen. Soap stone countertops in the kitchen with knotty wood custom cabinets with "gentle shut" hardware. Appliances are all built in and are professional quailty. Attached garage is completely finished with drywall and recessed lighting. Bathrooms have tile surrounds. Bedrooms and master suite on upper level. Deck off of southern side of home is accessable by 3 sliding doors. Marble fireplace surround in family room.

Other existing improvements to the site include a large, steel shop building located south of the residence. This structure is approximately 1,450 square feet, has ribbed steel walls and steel roof on a slab foundation. There is electrical power and water to the building and the shop area is heated. The quality is average to above average and condition is good. There is a small garden shed or tool shop of wood construction and rustic design near the existing garage. The shed is about 10 x 10. In the lower portion of the lot there is a two story accessory building of wood frame construction, T-1-11 siding and pier foundation. This is an older structure and is used as storage. Other uses could be made of it and it could also be remodeled into an accessory dwelling unit. Fair quality, average condition and typical to acreage properties in this market.


The homeowner is using the steel workshop for a home-based business (steel roofing). Use of workshops for home-based businesses is common in this rural area. Some property owners use their shops to restore cars, make wine, furniture or cabinetry, etc. These types of uses are permitted in the RL160 zoning district and the shop is not specially constructed for a single purpose. If the owner sells the property he would likely take any personal property tools or equipment with him and the workshop would be available for the next property owners use. There is no retail use of this space (i.e. no signage or walk in retail trade).
 
page 3 of 3


Comments on the sales comparison:Very low density, rural area with few sales or offerings in any given year and long periods of time may pass between sales of residential properties which are reasonably similar to each other. See the attached exhibit addendum for all sales in Hopland during the previous 24 months. Due to lack of recent and proximate sales of similar properties it was necessary to use comparables which are somewhat distant, dated or required numerous adjustments or total adjustments exceeding ideal guideliines. This is typical when valuing property in southern Mendocino County. Most of the sales or listings presented are located in the general Hopland area with sale comp 1 being the closest to the subject. Sale comp 3 is a recent sale northwest of the city of Ukiah and was included to present a sale of a similar size lot with a residence more similar in GLA to the subject. This location is the farthest from the subject. Site adjustments for differences in size vary depending on the amount of surplus land involved. Small differences in size not adjusted. See below for comments on the individual sales or listings. Some properties used in this report as comparable sales have small wine vineyards. The adjustment used was developed during the course of various appraisasl assignments in this area and based on extraction of this amenity using paired sales as well as income capitalization. For this particular area, a small 2 to 10 acre vineyard can contribute $30,000 to $35,000 per acre. Comp 1 has a 2.2 acre vineyard of Siraz grapes and comp 3 has a 7 acre vineyard of Syrah grapes. I estimate a downward adjustment of about $30,000 per acre to be reasonable. Quality adjustments when required were difficult but based on differences in quality of construction, finishes and amenities an adjustment of plus or minus $25 per square foot of the GLA is a reasonable estimate, again based on numerous property appraisals in the area over the years and the resulting relatively narrow range of market value indicators after applying the adjustment. Differences in GLA made at a rate of $40 per square foot. This amount is somewhat lower than I might have made for residence at this quality level but the subject is substantially larger than most where typically the larger residences are 2,500 to 3,500 square feet.



Comp 1: 1301 University Rd, Hopland. Located about one mile east of town on a 6.5 acre lot. The sale included an additional half acre buildable lot with a water hookup. The value that this lot contributed to the sale of comp 1 is roughly equal to the difference in value between 6.5 acre primary lot and the subject's larger 10.5 acre lot and an adjustment was not made. The residence is a 2,300 sq.ft vintage farmhouse which was extensively remodeled and updated prior to the sale. Good quality work and finishes, comparable to the subject's residence. The property features a 2.2 acre wine grape vineyard, a 2 car garage and a high quality, inground swimming pool with concrete decking and a small pool house. The contributory value of these outdoor amenities are more or less equal to the subject's large steel building and additional outbuildings and no adjustments were necessary.



Comp sale 2: Recent sale of a 30 acre property in McNab Ranch area, 6-7 miles northwest of Hopland. This property has three county assessor parcel numbers with each tract having 10 acres. As there are no certificates of compliance total area is considered one legal lot of record. The additional 20 acres of surplus land was adjusted downward at $5,000 per acre based on analysis of both improved and unimproved properties in this size range. Somewhat remote location with dirt and gravel roads but good views and seclusion. Outdoor features include a 960 Sqft shop area and a small hobby vineyard with about 250 vines. Simlar to the subject in condition and quality.

Comp sale 3: Located about 16 miles (measured in a straight line) from Hopland along Orr Springs Road. The location is an outlying area to the city of Ukiah and has similar rural chacteristics to the subject's neighborhood. Slightly larger 14 acre lot and the surplus was adjusted downward at about $20,000 per acre. Large custom home built in the early 1970's. Good quality custom construction and appointments but very little updatijng over the years. Selling agent states most potential buyers considered the costs of updating when viewing the property. A large upward adjustment based on cost and profit was made. Property features a 7 acre wine grape vineyard and a downward adjustment was made for this feature as explained above. 4 car tandem garage and a good quality inground pool and a small workshop. No adjustments made versus the subject's steel building and outbuildings.

Sale comp 4: Located about 2 miles west of the subject. This property is not ideal as a comparable sale due significant difference in lot size but is relevant due its location in Hopland where there are few sales in any given year. This sale demonstrates market acceptance of large, high quality residential improvements on acreage. 90 acre site located adjacent to larger commercial vineyards owned by a prominant wine producer. Comp 4 features a 20 acre wine grape vineyard, irrigation pond, 4 detached guest rooms and an older 2 bedroom accessory unit. Rammed earth construction of very good to excellent quality, high quality inground pool and patio.

Sale comp 5: A 2005 sale of an 11 acre property in the Felize Creek area, west of downtown Hopland (This Feliz Creek Road is not the same Felize Creek Road that Comp 2 is located on.) This sale is relevant due it's very similar lot size and because it demonstrates the marketability of very large residences in Hopland. More than 5,000 square feet and of very good quality construction and appointments. Similar in room, bedroom and bath count to the subject. Property features a 1,300+- square foot accessory dwelling unit and an inground pool as well as an older barn. Little change in property pricing during the past 24 months and a date of sale adjustment was not required.

Listing comp 6: On the market for 6 days, Comp #6 is located in the western hills of Ukiah. Older home of lesser quality than the subjet but which has had some updating and additions with the garage being converted into an office. Comp #6 is inferior in condition. Above ground pool has little value and no adjustments made.

The income approach was not developed. The cost approach was developed as a secondary valuation method and is given little consideration in the reconciliation of the approaches to value. Comp sale 1 required fewest adjustments (most similar property), comp sale 2 is the most recent sale of a reasonably similar property. It is reasonable to conclude that market value of the subject property is between $1,141,000 and $1,183,000. Point value opinion rounded to nearest $50,000,
 
When the new forms were designed I could have swore in one of my CE classes the instructor stated that the new forms were designed with LESS addendum in mind. How many sentences are available on the first page for neighborhood description and conditions? 3 or 4 each? Not exactly a lot to work with if "less addendum" was the point of the redesign.

If the clients want me to describe in the neighborhood description that the market is declining and supply and demand are not in balance why in the hell is there a check box? Oh wait! Thats for data mining.....thats right. I need to come to my senses and realize what we really have here is two reports in one. The summary reports for the data mining and the narrative we're supposed to include for the UW's. Thats right....where was my head?
 
Explain, explain

page 3 of 3


Comments on the sales comparison:Very low density, rural area with few sales or offerings in any given year and long periods of time may pass between sales of residential properties which are reasonably similar to each other. See the attached exhibit addendum for all sales in Hopland during the previous 24 months. Due to lack of recent and proximate sales of similar properties it was necessary to use comparables which are somewhat distant, dated or required numerous adjustments or total adjustments exceeding ideal guideliines. This is typical when valuing property in southern Mendocino County. Most of the sales or listings presented are located in the general Hopland area with sale comp 1 being the closest to the subject. Sale comp 3 is a recent sale northwest of the city of Ukiah and was included to present a sale of a similar size lot with a residence more similar in GLA to the subject. This location is the farthest from the subject. Site adjustments for differences in size vary depending on the amount of surplus land involved. Small differences in size not adjusted. See below for comments on the individual sales or listings. Some properties used in this report as comparable sales have small wine vineyards. The adjustment used was developed during the course of various appraisasl assignments in this area and based on extraction of this amenity using paired sales as well as income capitalization. For this particular area, a small 2 to 10 acre vineyard can contribute $30,000 to $35,000 per acre. Comp 1 has a 2.2 acre vineyard of Siraz grapes and comp 3 has a 7 acre vineyard of Syrah grapes. I estimate a downward adjustment of about $30,000 per acre to be reasonable. Quality adjustments when required were difficult but based on differences in quality of construction, finishes and amenities an adjustment of plus or minus $25 per square foot of the GLA is a reasonable estimate, again based on numerous property appraisals in the area over the years and the resulting relatively narrow range of market value indicators after applying the adjustment. Differences in GLA made at a rate of $40 per square foot. This amount is somewhat lower than I might have made for residence at this quality level but the subject is substantially larger than most where typically the larger residences are 2,500 to 3,500 square feet.



Comp 1: 1301 University Rd, Hopland. Located about one mile east of town on a 6.5 acre lot. The sale included an additional half acre buildable lot with a water hookup. The value that this lot contributed to the sale of comp 1 is roughly equal to the difference in value between 6.5 acre primary lot and the subject's larger 10.5 acre lot and an adjustment was not made. The residence is a 2,300 sq.ft vintage farmhouse which was extensively remodeled and updated prior to the sale. Good quality work and finishes, comparable to the subject's residence. The property features a 2.2 acre wine grape vineyard, a 2 car garage and a high quality, inground swimming pool with concrete decking and a small pool house. The contributory value of these outdoor amenities are more or less equal to the subject's large steel building and additional outbuildings and no adjustments were necessary.



Comp sale 2: Recent sale of a 30 acre property in McNab Ranch area, 6-7 miles northwest of Hopland. This property has three county assessor parcel numbers with each tract having 10 acres. As there are no certificates of compliance total area is considered one legal lot of record. The additional 20 acres of surplus land was adjusted downward at $5,000 per acre based on analysis of both improved and unimproved properties in this size range. Somewhat remote location with dirt and gravel roads but good views and seclusion. Outdoor features include a 960 Sqft shop area and a small hobby vineyard with about 250 vines. Simlar to the subject in condition and quality.

Comp sale 3: Located about 16 miles (measured in a straight line) from Hopland along Orr Springs Road. The location is an outlying area to the city of Ukiah and has similar rural chacteristics to the subject's neighborhood. Slightly larger 14 acre lot and the surplus was adjusted downward at about $20,000 per acre. Large custom home built in the early 1970's. Good quality custom construction and appointments but very little updatijng over the years. Selling agent states most potential buyers considered the costs of updating when viewing the property. A large upward adjustment based on cost and profit was made. Property features a 7 acre wine grape vineyard and a downward adjustment was made for this feature as explained above. 4 car tandem garage and a good quality inground pool and a small workshop. No adjustments made versus the subject's steel building and outbuildings.

Sale comp 4: Located about 2 miles west of the subject. This property is not ideal as a comparable sale due significant difference in lot size but is relevant due its location in Hopland where there are few sales in any given year. This sale demonstrates market acceptance of large, high quality residential improvements on acreage. 90 acre site located adjacent to larger commercial vineyards owned by a prominant wine producer. Comp 4 features a 20 acre wine grape vineyard, irrigation pond, 4 detached guest rooms and an older 2 bedroom accessory unit. Rammed earth construction of very good to excellent quality, high quality inground pool and patio.

Sale comp 5: A 2005 sale of an 11 acre property in the Felize Creek area, west of downtown Hopland (This Feliz Creek Road is not the same Felize Creek Road that Comp 2 is located on.) This sale is relevant due it's very similar lot size and because it demonstrates the marketability of very large residences in Hopland. More than 5,000 square feet and of very good quality construction and appointments. Similar in room, bedroom and bath count to the subject. Property features a 1,300+- square foot accessory dwelling unit and an inground pool as well as an older barn. Little change in property pricing during the past 24 months and a date of sale adjustment was not required.

Listing comp 6: On the market for 6 days, Comp #6 is located in the western hills of Ukiah. Older home of lesser quality than the subjet but which has had some updating and additions with the garage being converted into an office. Comp #6 is inferior in condition. Above ground pool has little value and no adjustments made.

The income approach was not developed. The cost approach was developed as a secondary valuation method and is given little consideration in the reconciliation of the approaches to value. Comp sale 1 required fewest adjustments (most similar property), comp sale 2 is the most recent sale of a reasonably similar property. It is reasonable to conclude that market value of the subject property is between $1,141,000 and $1,183,000. Point value opinion rounded to nearest $50,000,

Good show! I hope you did this one for someone who was willing to pay more than the typical AMC fee! BTW, did you get any requests for "Additional Comps?" I hope not.
 
Wowser Greg! I hope you charged appropriately for that puppy :new_smile-l:
 
Greg, that is a narrative style. Not a summary. Again, if the lenders want a narrative I would be happy to provide it.
 
They did ask for another comp. I told them to look at the exhibit addendum which contained a list of ALL sales and ALL listings in Hopland in the last 3 years and select which one they wanted me to talk about. They said never mind.
 
Greg, that is a narrative style. Not a summary. Again, if the lenders want a narrative I would be happy to provide it.


It is a summary not a narrative. If you are not doing those things then you really shoudlnt complain about getting stips.
Great post Greg ... that is how we do it as well and we have very very few stips.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Find a Real Estate Appraiser - Enter Zip Code

Copyright © 2000-, AppraisersForum.com, All Rights Reserved
AppraisersForum.com is proudly hosted by the folks at
AppraiserSites.com
Back
Top