D
Your point?
A key point Mark Lewis made was when concessions were added, the LTV is affected. 80%LTV, $100,000 = $80,000 loan. Add $4k as "concession" and 80% = $500 more, potentially the bank may be violating their own guideline and if FDIC examiner declared same then the entire loan would have to be counted against bank reserves.esp when it would be more likely to appraise at a lower price without the seller concession inflation.
Of course, it falls on the backs of appraisers that bend over and ignore the concessions with the bogus defense of "they're typical"A key point Mark Lewis made was when concessions were added, the LTV is affected. 80%LTV, $100,000 = $80,000 loan. Add $4k as "concession" and 80% = $500 more, potentially the bank may be violating their own guideline and if FDIC examiner declared same then the entire loan would have to be counted against bank reserves.
Your point?
appraisers that bend over and ignore the concessions with the bogus defense of "they're typical"
I find concessions are part of the total package. In their minds they paid $100k. They bot for $100k. The home was $100k. It was worth $100k.
Closing costs, concessions, agent fees, county, transfer are sometimes $10k, $20k, $0.