USPAP also requires that you state all assumptions and limiting conditions you relied on. How do you "indicate the probability it is in Average (or other) condition" without seeing it? You make assumptions, and those you are claiming are doing it wrong state those assumptions to the reader understands them. They don't mislead by hiding them in an unsupported "probability" statement.
In a URAR form, those assumptions and limiting conditions are pre printed/stated on the form itself. The appraiser certifies they relied on the printed assumptions with their signature. That is what some who do little,/ no mortgage work fail to understand. The URAR form is not "just a form". The form imposes certain assignment conditions. Such as we can not add an extraordinary assumption outside the HC or EA of as is or subject to check boxes.. So if an appraiser modifies the form by modifying it or adding an EA, they have violated assignment conditions
If we find an assignment condition unacceptable, turn down the assignment. Typically, a lender who orders on a URAR form will not accept appraiser using a GP form instead. But ask anyway, if anyone wants . Verbiage about probability was a suggestion responding to another poster.
We don't see the interior, regardless of verbiage or assumptions. That is an inherent risk with ext or desktop assignments. Most of which I turn down for that reason. However, some choose to do these assignments. Imo, there is less risk with a REO use or pre foreclosure use than for an origination loan. It is a business decision for each appraiser to make