Why would Phil Crawford waste his time? There's a reason I rarely post on this forum anymore. It's become a group of Karens.
All Phil Crawford did was take a single example that took place in his 'back yard' to illustrate how a waiver could have an impact on the market. That's all. Did it strike a nerve? Go to YouTube and search for Market Moves - Freddie Mac on Appraisal Waivers and listen to Danny Wiley's comments that dropped within 24-48 hours of Phil's broadcast. Perhaps thou dost protest too much.
There is only one source of data as to appraisal waivers and if they have any impact on market values OR loan losses, and that's Fannie and Freddie. Waivers are not likely to be disclosed in any MLS for a reason. In Phil's example, while any data set can be flawed, I'm not seeing how the overall 'common sense approach' to a potential market impact doesn't raise an eyebrow, at the very least. In the big scheme of things will it make a difference? <shrug> I doubt it. ~10% of purchases with most waivers associated with a substantial down payment--who cares?
For refi's already on the books--to Danny Wiley's point, who needs a full blown appraisal for those scenarios?
Technology is advancing and while I would have hoped it would have prompted most appraisers to raise their game, it's become obvious to me that appraisers are so far removed from embracing any statistical analysis in their daily work, it's no wonder AVM's and Hybrid products are winning the race.
It's easy to find fault with any analysis. Why doesn't George Hatch run his own analysis in his own back yard in Carlsbad and test Phil's waiver theory? Apparently, he has time on his hands.