David vs Goliath

[djd09]

The most valuable lesson anyone can learn is to not put all your eggs in one basket. I would never only work for one company.

i'm pretty sure the revaa cheerleaders haven't filled out a 1004 in 15 years....and they are giving advice and cheer away boys

 

[djd09]

they whine when i make a religious post....a constitution post...a post about the unethical stakeholders...well squeal piggy squeal

 

[glenn walker]

i'm pretty sure the revaa cheerleaders haven't filled out a 1004 in 15 years....and they are giving advice and cheer away boys

Revaa is mostly lenders and AMC and
few appraisers, but ones working inside the Corporate divisions. Few individual fee appraisers unless they own or manage fee panels. You should attend a convention to get better informed.

 

[djd09]

Revaa is mostly lenders and AMC and
few appraisers, but ones working inside the Corporate divisions. Few individual fee appraisers unless they own or manage fee panels. You should attend a convention to get better informed.

which one do you want to meet at....

 

[glenn walker]

which one do you want to meet at....

I'm not a member and I'm not associated with any AMC or Bank that markets for or supports them, but I believe they provide some good services for that platform.

 

[glenn walker]

Joan T was telling you guys 15 years
ago things were going to change but it fell on deaf ears. Rather than update their old business models most wanted to shoot the messenger instead and whimper.

They say they want honest information but in reality they wanted to only hear what they liked or agreed with. So the GSEs tell them what they want to hear
but do what they plan on doing.

You can't blame them because when they yell you the truth you just call them liars and unethical no good crooks. Therefore you're never going to know what's really happening until it's already been designed and implemented. By March you won't be using the 1004 anymore and you'll adapt or go broke.

 

[chad hampton]

Wanna bet on march?

 

[chad hampton]

never mind, you didn’t say the year.

 

[djd09]

i have more respect for a flea on a dog then joan...

 

[djd09]

Elizabeth Warren’s Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Is Unconstitutional On Its Face​

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) is a federal agency created in 2010 after the 2008 financial crisis to regulate consumer finance products like credit cards, mortgages, and loans.

• It was Elizabeth Warren’s idea, and she helped design it under the Obama Administration.
• It was officially created by the Dodd-Frank Act and later headed by a single Director appointed for a 5-year term.
• The CFPB is not funded by Congress but directly by the Federal Reserve, meaning Congress can’t control its budget.

Why it’s likely​

• The Constitution gives Congress control over the purse (Article I, Section 9). The CFPB bypasses this by getting funding from the Fed.
• The President is supposed to control the Executive Branch (Article II), but can’t remove the CFPB Director at will.
• That means neither elected branch (Congress or President) has real power over the CFPB — a violation of separation of powers.

In short: Warren helped create a powerful agency that spends money without Congress and isn’t under the President’s full authority — making it structurally incompatible with the Constitution.

Elizabeth Warren’s Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Is Unconstitutional On Its Face * 100PercentFedUp.com * by Noah

Uncover the unsettling truth behind Elizabeth Warren's Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) and why its very existence raises constitutional alarms. Delve into the implications of a powerful agency operating without congressional oversight. Read on to learn more!

100percentfedup.com

squeal squeal squeal...