Does This C5 Rating Sound Right?

[Deleted member 134708]

It puts feet in the mouths of some of the posters here, but otherwise, not really. It can be important to read details and take things into context. Your appraiser says the house is C5 in as-is condition. I believe you have read the UAD definition, and I would say to read it again, this time try to read it without bias, instead of searching for your loophole. That house is C5 in my market. No baseboards, sub floors only, holes in the walls, missing doors and yes, some missing outlet covers too. You can live in it, but would you prefer to? That would qualify in my market as diminished livability.

Bro. You are referencing a post 30 comments down the line. That's an updated post. Read post #1 and then talk to us.

If that would have been post #1 this would turned out much different comments. What, should we have randomely known future posts?

 

[Deleted member 130081]

Bro. You are referencing a post 30 comments down the line. That's an updated post. Read post #1 and then talk to us.

If that would have been post #1 this would turned out much different comments. What, should we have randomely known future posts?

Bro, that takes post number 1 and all others into account. I actually read through them. Read #1 again and see for yourself.

 

[Deleted member 134708]

So read comments after his updated post and then come talk. Once he said it was actually C3 rated and not C5. No one said anything.

 

[Deleted member 134708]

Bro, that takes post number 1 and all others into account. I actually read through them. Read #1 again and see for yourself.

Post #1. No other post. Just post #1.

Appraisal done subject to repairs. This is now a hypothetical appraisal. OP said appraiser states subject currently in C5 condition. This means the subject in all aspects of the report is in C5 condition.

This cannot be true. The report is hypothetical as if repaired. The home cannot be in C5 condition. I called the appraiser an idiot.

Turns out in post #20 it was actually done C3 and that's an addendum comment. (Which I wouldn't of put in but not a big deal)

After post #20, no more original appraiser idiot talk.

 

[Deleted member 130081]

So read comments after his updated post and then come talk. Once he said it was actually C3 rated and not C5. No one said anything.

Sure lets talk. He said it was C3/C5 in the first post and only clarified it further later, because people here turned the thread into a witch hunt, instead of reading the post thoroughly and responding accordingly. That would include yourself, who insulted the appraiser without reading through post #1, that did in fact provide adequate information to sort through the question. Glad we are providing a professional example to the public here.

 

[Deleted member 130081]

Post #1. No other post. Just post #1.

Appraisal done subject to repairs. This is now a hypothetical appraisal. OP said appraiser states subject currently in C5 condition. This means the subject in all aspects of the report is in C5 condition.

This cannot be true. The report is hypothetical as if repaired. The home cannot be in C5 condition. I called the appraiser an idiot.

Turns out in post #20 it was actually done C3 and that's an addendum comment. (Which I wouldn't of put in but not a big deal)

After post #20, no more original appraiser idiot talk.

OMG. I rest my case.