Eating Crow, Not Southern Fried Chicken

[Fred]

Was it perhaps Stephanie Coleman

Thank You !!

And this gets to my pet peeve, “USPAP by Hearsay.” Acceptable practice is not defined by what a person says, but by what USPAP says. Learn the standards. Many of these posts I have seen citing some infallible person instead of USPAP line numbers contain obvious factual errors and raise question as to the alleged USPAP oracle is even being correctly quoted.

This is probably a waste of cyber ink, but the question of whether an appraisal can be "re-assigned" depends on whether it was "assigned" in the first place. That is, before answering what are the minimum standards governing how an appraiser can respond to a subsequent call about a property already appraised, one would need to know the wording of the inteded use statements and the use restrictions cited in the original report. Any accross-the-board answer that fails to look at the exact context of the use restrictions on the first report is hasty in making at least one unrecognized assumption.

 

[Ray Miller]

All my reports state that the report is for xxxxxxx and that user only. I posted it a while back in another thread.

 

[Carnivore]

Thank you Steven.

You have made the point quite well that Ray could not possibly have been wrong because Ray was the only one privy to the details of the first assignment. Ray was absolutely correct(we assume he follows USPAP) when he told the Ameriquest Big Dog what he(Ray) would need to do for the new assignment.

Not me, not anyone and certainly not any shill would know the actual details of the first assignment except for Ray and the original Client. Under confidentiality section of USPAP Ray was absolutely right to not explain this to the predatory lender.

 

[Karl]

Not only did Client B go out & get another Appraiser to do the Appraisal I'll bet he faxed the other clients Appraisal to the Appraiser, the Appraiser snapped new pictures of the Subject got comp pictures out of Data Base & charged whatever & got more business from client B.

To get a job in any political field & AI is a political field "Keep the Mortgage Industury Happy" U must be able to answer a question in a perfect circle. Note how everyone say she wasn't wrong BUT. Of course Ray has lost revenue BUT AI wasn't actually wrong BUT an Appraiser has lost revenue & should understand the rules.