Incognito is right about the REL being "0" on a property in good condition if residential doesn't add to the value due to HBU. But in practice I use total economic life and remaining economic life to measure physical depreciation only, and then make separate adjustments for functional and economic. I know it can be done either way and that by the book the total economic life of a structure would include the functional and economic depreciation.
When I do my total economic life, because of situations like you are in, I want something physical I can fall back on. I can either extract a total economic life from the market or I can use the table on page E-7 in the Marshall & Swift which says this:
Low Quality: Frame 45 yrs, Masonry 50 yrs; MFH SW 20 yrs, Multi-Wide 30 yrs
Fair Quality: Frame 50 yrs; Masonry 55 yrs; MFH SW 25 yrs, Multi-Wide 35 yrs
Avg Quality: Frame 55 yrs, Masonry 60 yrs; MFH SW 30 yrs, Mutli-Wide 40 yrs
Good Qualy: Frame 55 yrs; Masonry 60 yrs; MFH SW 35 yrs, Multi-Wide 45 yrs
VGd Quality: Frame 60 yrs; Masonry 60 yrs; MFH SW 40 yrs, Multi-Wide 50 yrs
Exc Quality: Frame 60 yrs; Masonry 65 yrs; MFH SW 45 yrs, Multi-Wide 55 yrs
Sometimes I find it possible to extract the total economic life from the market, but that's a long process using houses that were not updated (usually less than 5 years old), knowing the land value, and measuring their cost against their sale price, determining the depreciation, dividing into the cost to build and finding the number of years it would take to fully depreciate.