- Joined
- Jun 27, 2017
- Professional Status
- Certified General Appraiser
- State
- California
Providing an effective age of a stick built home within the body of an appraisal report in most states is not brain surgery.
Yet some people on this forum insist that it is.
smh.
Well, that's a loose statement if I have ever come across one. "Providing an effective age" per se can be done by pulling a number out of a hat between 0 and 20. Is that all you do? Hmmmm.
Actually in fact, in many if not most cases effective age doesn't mean that much. This is particularly true of older homes that have gone through many partial updates. And we all know if you put the effective age at over 25 years, you do start to get push back by the AMCs and lenders. So, there are many homes we can be sure where this value is inaccurate, to say the least. There are more issues you can throw at this issue than can be listed here. For example, you wouldn't get close to a good estimate without a good thorough home inspection by a qualified home and termite inspector that appraisers virtually never do. Even home and termite inspectors can't see every detail and defect. Some are very good, some OK, and some atrocious.
At its best, effective age is only a very approximate guess as to what maintenance is going to look like for the next 30 years for a 70-year-old post-World War II home.
It is not brain surgery, because there is no specific protocol with tight definitions and methods that will work in all cases. Anybody who claims that it is brain surgery for all homes doesn't know what they are talking about.
Last edited: