Not quite the approach I would suggestOff with their heads!
What's the solution?
I read the certifications-the problem is Fannie certifications cannot be amended so we sign them no matter what they sayMaybe appraisers should read the certifications they are signing?
If one cannot obtain a data source for the interior condition, then the appraisal should not be completed. However, the intent of adopting the revised certifications and allowing use of data by the property owner was to minimize the number of cases where the appraiser could not obtain data.
Only problem is the MLS data and pictures are from a sale 5-years ago and owners can and do lie about condition (also most exteriors engagements say the owner is NOT to be contacted). An appraisal is based on a current, specific date.
Once again Fannie is requiring the appraiser to take on more unreasonable liability and that's why we all have million dollar E/O.
How many appraisers after inspecting the property, gathering their comparables, completing the information on page 1, and then after an hour of research come to the conclusion that the 'information is not adequate' to draw a peer standard conclusion they cannot opine with GSE certainty on the interior condition? Does the appraiser get $75 for a cancelation?
I do not know, as that depends on business arrangements between an appraiser and a client.How many appraisers after inspecting the property, gathering their comparables, completing the information on page 1, and then after an hour of research come to the conclusion that the 'information is not adequate' to draw a peer standard conclusion they cannot opine with GSE certainty on the interior condition? Does the appraiser get $75 for a cancelation?