• Welcome to AppraisersForum.com, the premier online  community for the discussion of real estate appraisal. Register a free account to be able to post and unlock additional forums and features.

Extraction Method

Status
Not open for further replies.
The cost approach pre-dates the sales approach by many decades.
Old homes predate new homes, sometimes by many decades as well, but that doesn't make them better homes...:rof:
 
(my bold)
Well said! (y) :clapping: and what I try to portray in my reports; especially in any sort of review assignments
I like the terms 'supported' or 'unsupported', but agreed - reasonable is a fair term as well.
 
"accurate values" is a Fannie thing.
 
I like the terms 'supported' or 'unsupported', but agreed - reasonable is a fair term as well.

That was one of GH's posts from a while back. "Opinions are more fairly characterized as being credible or not credible, supported or not supported."
 
The topic of accurate vs reasonable was covered when I took the USPAP Instructor Qualifications course. I didn't make any of it up.

The only place where "accurate" shows up in any of the SRs is in the reporting requirements:

Each _____ report must​
(a) clearly and accurately set forth the appraisal (review) in a manner that will not be misleading.​
(b) contain sufficient information to enable the intended user(s) of the appraisal (review) to understand the report properly, and​
(c) clearly and accurately disclose all assumptions, extraordinary assumptions, hypothetical conditions, and limiting conditions used in the appraisal.​


When is comes to the appraisers opinions and conclusions the operative term used in USPAP is "reasonable"and "credible", as in

When an opinion of reasonable exposure time has been developed..... .
The appraiser has a reasonable basis for the extraordinary assumption
The signing appraiser is required to have a reasonable basis for believing that those individuals performing that work are competent......
credible assignment results
credible appraisal
credible opinions and conclusions
credible analysis

etc - you get the point.


As I say, "accurate" is a term Fannie uses to characterize a value conclusion, and the rationale for why we shouldn't be that stoked on their usage of it is because it implies an unrealistic expectation of precision that we don't normally assert in our opinions and conclusions. And, as the course says, the first step of attaining credibility is to establish reasonable expectations.

As I say, none of this is original thinking on my part. I'm just regurgitating the materials I've been exposed to before.
 
Last edited:
Stop saying regurgitating and exposed in the same sentence. :sick:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Find a Real Estate Appraiser - Enter Zip Code

Copyright © 2000-, AppraisersForum.com, All Rights Reserved
AppraisersForum.com is proudly hosted by the folks at
AppraiserSites.com
Back
Top